mats12
Geotechnical
- Dec 17, 2016
- 181
I have a steel moment frame (beam welded to columns)as shown below.
I have designed this frame as fixed at supports. Then I have desing connection (base plate + anchors) between RC foundation and column.
If I consider my support reactions while Im designing/calculating foundation I get an enormous dimensions since a moment at the base of column (fixed support) is pretty big.
But if i make a 3d model in FEM software I get much smaller foundation (600 x 600 mm with depth of 900 mm) because I think it takes into account that foundations will rotate a bit (I have modeled soil as springs under foundation. I checked forces/moments in columns and it looks like the software calculated them as the supports were PINNED). In reality does that mean, that there will be some rotation of foundation which means I could consider my supports as pinned not fixed? Which model should I use since I get so much different results in terms of foundation dimensions?
I have designed this frame as fixed at supports. Then I have desing connection (base plate + anchors) between RC foundation and column.
If I consider my support reactions while Im designing/calculating foundation I get an enormous dimensions since a moment at the base of column (fixed support) is pretty big.
But if i make a 3d model in FEM software I get much smaller foundation (600 x 600 mm with depth of 900 mm) because I think it takes into account that foundations will rotate a bit (I have modeled soil as springs under foundation. I checked forces/moments in columns and it looks like the software calculated them as the supports were PINNED). In reality does that mean, that there will be some rotation of foundation which means I could consider my supports as pinned not fixed? Which model should I use since I get so much different results in terms of foundation dimensions?