Burunduk's latest activity

I don't mean to sound like a technophobe, but why not just do a pen/pencil sketch and post a scan or picture? That looks like a lot of...

Or as shown in these examples... The first one is the same as using a Continuous Feature modifier for the 35+/-0.1 diameter.

Season, In the second case, there is no control over how off-coaxial the two ends can be. Here is an exaggerated illustration.

Tolerances for the fixture design should be about 1/10 of the tolerances being verified by the fixture.

greenimi, A cylindricity tolerance zone, whether per unit length or full length, is always 2 coaxial cylinders. Suppose a measured zone...

mfgenggear, I think there could be a go gage fixture as 3DDave described: two recesses of diameter 20.53 and a saddle of diameter 23.1...

As 3DDave mentioned, most of those requirements can be verified with a functional go gage. That is because datum reference A(M)-B(M) is...

If you delete the datum feature qualifying feature control frames, your datum features A and B will be left uncontrolled other than for...

Why not establish a datum reference frame from datum features or datum targets and then apply simultaneous profile requirements to the...

See "Limited Length or Area Indication" in ASME Y14.5.

SEP REQT doesn't require two separate set ups, it just means that the unconstrained degrees of freedom in a single set up can be used to...

Thank you!

Doug, profile is not permitted to be modified with MMC (it's not a feature-of-size thing, but merely a surface or line). I think the...

mfgenggear, Sorry, I'm not sure I follow. Possibly I wasn't clear enough with the question too. I'd like the inspected profile to be...

mfgenggear, One more question if possible: How would you make sure that the location of datum axis A is repeatable for all measured...