The fact that you remember the rules different, just highlights the confusion. Making it even more complicated is the fact that not only can each sheet be at a different revision level, you can have ADCNs that apply to different sheets.
That's all well and good, but in my case the PO is for the top assembly that incorporates hundreds of parts that are defined by Boeing prints, some that we purchase from suppliers.
Yeah, you summarized my frustration with a pretty good description. I dont have access, therefore am flying a bit blind. I didnt know there were different drafting manuals by program, but am not surprised.
Yes, most Boeing drawings do have a separate parts list. The counterpoint to my position is that the part revision is the revision of the parts list. That cant be true because parts list never have ADCNs attached, but drawings sheets do.
I have always understood that the part revision took on the revision of the first sheet of the drawing that the part first appears on. Is this correct? Where can I find that definition to solve a dispute with a supplier?
The problem is the rest of the note gives some conflicting requirements in a hardness range and a BAC spec. I cant find any interpretation of quotes in a note that would indicate it would be reference or guidance, but I suspect it was the intent. The problem is that the drawing is so old I...
I have an old drawing with a note that specifies the heat treatment of the part. Part of the information is in quotes - "H900". Does anyone know what quotes mean in a drawing note?
