Right on, I don't intend to, code provision or not. The fire issue scares me a little too much.
I would hope removing that code provision (which only implies the concern to begin with) doesn't kick that can further down the wrong road.
Thanks for the response!
This makes sense to me. Thanks for the response! I think you're saying they eased the code restriction back and let the engineer be responsible for considering the differential movement instead of the code imposing a low limit.
However, what is still confusing to me is the removal of this...
Do I need to be invited to the "Engineers with Hobbies" group to join? There's a join button, but when I click it, I get an error as seen below:
I kinda had assumed that it's because my post count is low (been consistently lurking for almost three years, just never posted), but I'm not...
An EI/EIT (engineering intern/engineer in training) is what you become in the state's eyes once you pass the Fundamentals of Engineering exam after college. I have a certificate from the state board that says I am an Engineering Intern with a EI number and everything. That's the official...
In TMS 402-16, sections 12.2.2.3.1.2 and 12.2.2.3.2 (sorry, dyslexics) limit the height of masonry veneer supported on wood to 12 ft, and require lintels over openings to be supported by non-combustible framing where the veneer isn't self-supporting. I point to these provisions semi-often to get...