Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations cowski on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Recent content by engineer0

  1. engineer0

    ASME B31.8 831.4.2(c) vs. 831.4.2(j)(3) - Reinforcement members and Pressurized Sleeves, End face thicknesses & fillet welds

    @LittleInch greatly appreciate your feedback on this. I will consult ASME B31.4 to hopefully assist my understanding of reinforcement requirements. Everything you've said makes sense—a sudden change in thickness, as opposed to gradual, along the pipeline will concentrate the stress in an...
  2. engineer0

    ASME B31.8 831.4.2(c) vs. 831.4.2(j)(3) - Reinforcement members and Pressurized Sleeves, End face thicknesses & fillet welds

    I posted a similar question the other day with no responses so far, but may be able to explain it better in this post. End face of a reinforcement member in 831.4.2(c) states that it should be tapered to the thickness of the header while 831.4.2(j)(3) seems to indicate for pressurized sleeves...
  3. engineer0

    End Face Dimension - ASME B31.8 831.4.2(j)(3)

    In regards to Pressurized Hot Tap Tee Reinforcing Sleeves, ASME B31.8 831.4.2(j)(3) states that "the face dimension should not exceed 1.4 times the calculated thickness required to meet the maximum hoop stress of the pressurized sleeve. The leg of the fillet deposited on the end face need not be...
  4. engineer0

    ASME B31.8 - Spherical-type fitting - fitting thickness

    Can anyone explain how either/both of these images adhere to ASME B31.8? They’re the same fitting but one has been beveled to allow for a full penetration groove(?) weld as opposed to just a fillet(?) weld. Anyone else have issues using these spherical fittings at your company?

Part and Inventory Search