Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations KootK on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Search results for query: *

  1. NoahLKatz

    Why is Mazda bell housing designed like this?

    Ah, thanks for the link. So while the trans isn't cantilevered, its connection to that frame makes it part of a long beam in bending.
  2. NoahLKatz

    Why is Mazda bell housing designed like this?

    Could be. A guy on a Miata forum who seems knowledgeable said "Bending strength and stiffness of the engine/transmission assembly. The drivetrain is structural in the Miata, there are no transmission mounts." Surprising if the entire trans is cantilevered from the engine.
  3. NoahLKatz

    Why is Mazda bell housing designed like this?

    Mazda, and a lot of other makes, have a large. and unused as far as I can tell, area at the top of their bell housings. What's it for? I wouldn't think it's needed for MOI, which is already enormous. And why the double walls at certain points around the periphery?
  4. NoahLKatz

    Bushing compliance vs. kinematic wheel recession for reducing impact harshness

    > Many if not most luxo sleds use hydraulic bushings whose impedance is bandpass for isolation purposes. Hmm; besides not seeing why lowpass wouldn't be better, how is that achieved? > much of your noise & vibration energy comes thru the steering gear, which is why so many luxo rides have...
  5. NoahLKatz

    Bushing compliance vs. kinematic wheel recession for reducing impact harshness

    > a suspension where there is only aft movement allowed, seems like that characteristic isn't so good. No one has suggested that. > Has anyone made a suspension that has only linear movement but the movement is not normal to the nominal ground? Motorcycle telescopic forks.
  6. NoahLKatz

    Bushing compliance vs. kinematic wheel recession for reducing impact harshness

    No worries there, single rear wheel on a trailing arm.
  7. NoahLKatz

    Bushing compliance vs. kinematic wheel recession for reducing impact harshness

    OK, I need to spend some time on laying out components and see what packaging issues emerge. Very interesting about bushings; are there any that have a reasonable high ratio of axial to radial compliance? Though hard to think how to do that without sliding surfaces. > If you really want good...
  8. NoahLKatz

    Bushing compliance vs. kinematic wheel recession for reducing impact harshness

    As for kinematic recession, I guess no one has anything to say because it just isn't used anymore...right?
  9. NoahLKatz

    Bushing compliance vs. kinematic wheel recession for reducing impact harshness

    Swinny, Thanks for straightening that out. I remember having a short ride on city streets in an in-law's BMW, was new about a dozen years ago so likely what we're talking about. Dunno about the handling, but I remember greatly disliking all the noise on bumps and dips. I wonder if I'm...
  10. NoahLKatz

    Bushing compliance vs. kinematic wheel recession for reducing impact harshness

    Speaking of Bug's and 356's, anyone know their ride frequencies? That's what I'd like to target.
  11. NoahLKatz

    Bushing compliance vs. kinematic wheel recession for reducing impact harshness

    Greg, > In practice once you consider frame stiffness and so on then for a lightly built car where refinement is a secondary priority, symmetrical ^ arms make more sense usually. Refinement is *not* a secondary priority. Using a motorcycle analogy, my aim is to build a comfortable but agile...
  12. NoahLKatz

    Bushing compliance vs. kinematic wheel recession for reducing impact harshness

    Thanks for digging up the nice pic. So if I'm understanding this correctly, when a bump tries to push the lower ball joint back, the arm pivots around the stiff bushing at the upper right. Given that the angle is roughly 45 deg from the BJ to the upper left bushing, the latter would have to be...
  13. NoahLKatz

    Bushing compliance vs. kinematic wheel recession for reducing impact harshness

    > The rear suspension of some production cars often has kinematic recession in bounce... For instance, rear twist beam suspensions . Therefore the only hope for acceptable impact harshness is compliance Do I have the terminology wrong? I thought recession meant the wheel moves backward as the...
  14. NoahLKatz

    Bushing compliance vs. kinematic wheel recession for reducing impact harshness

    Very interesting, thanks, I'll see if I can google that or make a sketch that fits the description.
  15. NoahLKatz

    Bushing compliance vs. kinematic wheel recession for reducing impact harshness

    Is it possible to equate a given amount of kinematic wheel recession to control arm bushing horizontal compliance? Assuming double wishbones and LCA canted down at the back, is it as simple as taking the horizontal component of the suspension spring compliance? I'm guessing not, since the...
  16. NoahLKatz

    Double ball joint suspension - missing link?

    Thanks for the link, though he didn't really say anything specific enough to increase my understanding. Upon first reading about these, I expected that there would be a 5th link to restrain the new DOF and that one end would have a rubber pushing to allow wheel recession, but that wasn't borne...
  17. NoahLKatz

    Double ball joint suspension - missing link?

    I never paid much attention to these until now but have become interested after reading that they can improve the ride/handling tradeoff. A conventional A-arm is a structure, but the 4-bar resulting from replacing it with two links is a mechanism, where a longitudinal force/motion would tend to...
  18. NoahLKatz

    Anyone know anything about AMPS (Advanced Multi-Physics Simulation) FEA?

    I'm thinking of getting it to go along with an IronCad license for personal use (I'm retired). My concern is that aside from their and IronCad's websites, all I can find by googling is 6+ years old posts here by GBor, who sold it but whose website is gone.
  19. NoahLKatz

    Chassis torsional stiffness 1965 and today

    > How did you conclude that torsional resistance of a [typical] chassis is "near linear"? Why put quotes on something I didn't exactly say? I said why, but to elaborate, metals have a very linear stress-strain curve until yield is approached. Do you think twisting your frame a few degrees is...
  20. NoahLKatz

    Chassis torsional stiffness 1965 and today

    If I remember correctly, deflections that are no more than a few % of the length over which they're measured are considered small and within the linear range, which seems to fit the situation here.

Part and Inventory Search