I agree. My issue on this print is that all of the other basic dimensions in that view are not controlled anywhere else on the print. I've got no choice except to inspect it to what is shown and explain it just that way.
I could rant on and on but I'm comfortable with my approach.
Thanks again.
Evan, thank you for your comments. Believe me when I say they're appreciated. I think I stated previously, I'm nowhere near an expert at GDT, nor ASME Y14.5. I do however feel I've got a firm grasp on a practical approach to dimensioning and control. As well, if it doesn't seem right, it...
I agree with your take on this but the note doesn't tell me the extent of my tolerance. I have to apply the profile to the basic dimensions. The basic dimensions establish the true contour or my basic shape. I then apply my profile equally to the basic shape. This is how I'm proceeding for lack...
Thanks for advice on posting print.
The question was answered. The Form is controlled only as shown. At issue is the location of the features shown. These are not controlled on the print properly.
From a strictly practical purpose, I'm having a difficult time at my facility. Everyone here...
I got this up yesterday in a hurry and apologize. I see where I'm ranting which at this point is not surprising at all. I tried to attach a document but can't seem to figure it out though my company may be blocking it. I may have been able to upload an Excel sheet which gives the needed detail...
New to this so bare with me, 1st Post.
I have a print that calls out profile to itself. At 1st glance one would assume this to be true. The entire print shows Profile Tolerances with no Datum identifiers. The Notes identify (UOS, all dimensions are in relation to the hard point nest). The...
