Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations KootK on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Search results for query: *

  1. Ehiman1

    Blind Threaded holes tubesheet

    Thank you for your help. UG-43 is based on ratio of allowable strength of the materials (screw and component) and diameter oh the bolt/hole and everything is clear. In these days checking the different codes I also found a similar formula in EN-13445-3 code, but I don’t understand why the...
  2. Ehiman1

    Blind Threaded holes tubesheet

    Hello, I have a heat exchanger where tubesheet has blind threaded holes where a flange is bolted. Does it necessary to calculate the length of the threaded holes in the tubesheet? It doesn’t exist a formula in tubesheet chapter to check it according to ASME. Can we follow good engineering practice?
  3. Ehiman1

    Wrong commercial clarification cost impact

    Hello, I am a young project manager and I have a problem with a client because of wrong commercial clarification during bidding phase. Unfortunately commercial guys confirmed for installation of steel platform without considering the price for this. This involves 20.000 € don’t considered in our...
  4. Ehiman1

    Differential thermal expansion between stainless steel flange And low alloy steel bolts

    Unfortunately we don’t know the bolts temperature without a thermal analysis and this is the first doubt. My concern is not about the bolts because SA-193 B7 has an important yield/tensile strength, so they can absorb an additional load due to thermal expansion. To me the problem is that this...
  5. Ehiman1

    Differential thermal expansion between stainless steel flange And low alloy steel bolts

    Hello, I have a heat exchanger flange in stainless steel with bolts in low alloy steel at high temperature (400 C) and camprofile gasket in stainless steel. The code is ASME VIII div1. We checked the flange with appendix 2 and then with ASME PCC-1 appendix O to check the joint against leakage...
  6. Ehiman1

    ASME pcc calculation required?

    Step 5 and 6 of paragraph O-4.2 of ASME PCC appendix O isn’t verified. To solve this we need to increase bolts size to create higher stress on gasket but this involves higher stress on flange and this means to increase flange thickness as well. At the end, a common calculation with appendix 2...
  7. Ehiman1

    ASME pcc calculation required?

    Hello, I checked a girth flange of a heat exchanger in accordance with ASME VIII div1 appendix 2, as per project specification and everything is verified, but if I check the flange with ASME PCC-1 appendix O as well, the verification isn’t ok. Bolts are not enough to seat the gasket. In this...
  8. Ehiman1

    Stress due to thermal expansion connecting nozzles

    Hello, I noticed a client request that we never had before regarding calculation of stacked heat exchangers. We have two AES type in stacked and client asks to calculate the stress due to Thermal expansion of connecting nozzles, does someone can help me? In other projects clients never asked to...
  9. Ehiman1

    Gasket particular shape - calculation

    Hello guys, I have to calculate a bolted joint with two welding neck flanges against high pressure with a particular gasket that I never used. This gasket has trapezoidal shape and I would like to know if it exists a calculation for this type of gasket. Code is EN13445 and pressure is 280 barg...
  10. Ehiman1

    Material in creep range

    Hello everyone, I am checking a calculation of a pressure vessel, where the operating temperature is 480 C and design temperature is 510 C for SA-387 gr.11 cl.1. In this case In accordance with ASME code the design temperature for this material is in creep range, so in my opinion design...
  11. Ehiman1

    Torquing

    Use ASME pcc-1 appendix J, not K
  12. Ehiman1

    Mawp UG-99 note 35 and B16.5 vs appendix 2

    Hi everyone, I have a unusual case, with a small pipe with two flanges ansi b16.5 3” #300 and two blinds (equipment ASME VIII div1 stamp). Pressure is 8 barg and temperature 70 C material Carbon steel. In this case I need to verify standard flange against external loads with UG-44b and...
  13. Ehiman1

    PED 2014 water temperature

    Yes thank you very much
  14. Ehiman1

    PED 2014 water temperature

    Thank you, because to me water has vapour pressure higher than 0.5 barg from 100 C and not 109/100 C. There is no evidence on the legislation
  15. Ehiman1

    PED 2014 water temperature

    Ok but at 100 C we have tension vapour already at 1 barg, so to me this means that water should be considered out of liquid phase. For PED it is valid only from 109 C but I can t find in the legislation the paragraph
  16. Ehiman1

    PED 2014 water temperature

    Hello, I can’t find in PED 2014/68 UE legislation where water is considered as gas only at temperature higher than 109 C and not from 100 C. Does someone can help me please?
  17. Ehiman1

    Motor support inside pressure vessel

    Good morning, I have to calculate thickness and bolts size of a motor support plate welded inside a pressure vessel shell course with ASME code. The support has circular shape and a hole at the center with the motor bolted on plate by 12 bolts 1” type (like that ones on reverse flange). In this...
  18. Ehiman1

    LWN with appendix 2 MAP lower than MAWP

    It is a client’s request when corrosion allowance is on the flange. I added an axial load and bending moment and calculated an equivalent pressure. Ah the same time they want I verify the rating and thickness of the flange against corrosion allowance
  19. Ehiman1

    LWN with appendix 2 MAP lower than MAWP

    Dear gents, I have to check a long welding neck 2” #300 with corrosion allowance (3 mm) and external loads with ASME appendix 2, but doing so I found that MAP is lower than MAWP. The required thickness is 20.3 mm and with LWN standard we have 20.7 mm. I don’t understand how it is possible that...
  20. Ehiman1

    MAWP limited by nozzle parts

    Hello everyone, I am designing a heat exchanger and I noticed that Mawp is limited by nozzle flange on shell side and a vent from tube side. In accordance with API 660 nozzle reinforcement (reinforcing pad) Can not limit Mawp but in this case the mawp is limited by a flange and a opening. Do you...

Part and Inventory Search