Thanks greenimi for your input.
- I can't believe I missed the Ø symbol; thanks for catching that.
- Ah, yes! I realize that the axes of holes are not considered a feature of size. I was tying to establish a center plane datum feature relative to the size of the part. I shall move datum...
I'm still learning GD&T, so I am going through these threads to learn new stuff and applicatoins.
I believe your intent is to have two holes perpendicular to datum feature D, and one hole perpendicular to datum feature A.
Actually, why isn't a perpendicularity control used?
I'm still learning GD&T, but I don't think this is right? It's not a feature of size? Because that edge is an axis, and I don't think the edge can be considered a feature by itself. Correct me if I'm wrong.
I would have used angularity. The only intent I can see is that the length of the angled...
I don't know if there is a standard for matching the MRP, but I've seen this in old documents at the company I work at. The company had a finished assembly and a packaged assembly. The packaged assembly would have the finished product and miscellaneous items like the manual, power cords, etc...
Hello,
I currently work for a small company, and it has no acknowledgement of GD&T. I recently took an online course for GD&T, and I think it can help a lot in production because supervisors constantly get inspected parts that don't fit even though drawings meet specifications. I believe its...
