Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations KootK on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Search results for query: *

  • Users: axelpop
  • Order by date
  1. axelpop

    Stiffness modification

    Hy! Ussualy, the stifness modification, due to damages is modelled by changing the geometrical characteristics, and not the modulus of elasticity, although in reality is not true. With, regards, Alex Popescu!
  2. axelpop

    Missing Resultant of Shell Elements!?

    Hy! I think All three moments, M11, M22, M12, are developped in vertical plane (The conventional arrow ->> directed in horiz. plane), therefore you cannot make an equivalence between neither of them and M22 of the beam which acts in horizontal plane (The conventional arrow ->> directed in vert...
  3. axelpop

    shell stresses interpretation

    I think you can follow the design force, by recording the base shear force of your wall.
  4. axelpop

    Shell Joint releases?

    I also study this problem. I tried to use very small shells with very small bending thickness, additional to my real shells. The results seams allright but I don't really trust these kind of tricks, so if anybody knows a "legal" way of modelling pin connected shells, please write me.
  5. axelpop

    How to interprete the result of shell element

    Click on -Help-> Search for Help on .. (or pressF1) -> Content -> Basic Concepts -> Sign Convention -> SHELL Element : Here I think you will find everything you need!

Part and Inventory Search