Maybe I mispoke, since I did not procure a demo from them, I can not give details
I just went on what their literature shows. If a "parallel system" has to run, they sure don't make it seem like it is there, the interface and the way the info is presented and handled gives the impression...
Sorry about the late response
Our biggest factor was that all other solutions we saw (except the Conisio, but we saw it after the decision had been made)required to run a "parallel" system, duplicating what we already do in SAP; granted that the other solutions might be user-friendlier, but I...
I've seen demos for PDMWorks and I like the way the relationships, versions, users, revisions, etc. are handled, the interface is very friendly, however the Gedas interface has very similar capabilities although not as graphical. So what I don't like that much is the graphical capabilities. No...
this is for dtello, or any other members that since then have been using Gedas and SAP's PDM. I am really interested in their experiences. We are leaning very heavily in favor of Gedas, as I read on one of this forums. it seems to be the only one that has a real interface between the 2 programs...
My dept. uses SAP's PDM. We implemented it about 4 years ago, and it had worked good (not great 'cause the user interface is not the friendliest), until now, when we are moving to Solidworks and are facing the fact that it would be extremely easier if we had something like PDMWorks to handle...
