Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations waross on being selected by the Tek-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Search results for query: *

  1. cadjunkie

    part names in an assembly not as their saved names....

    ...it's ok, don't all rush at once - have found the solution.... :~) [by changing the name at the top of the spec tree of the NEW part to the name I want, (RMB, and select properties) and then saving the new part "normally" - so then, do not have to use 'save as' to give the new file...
  2. cadjunkie

    part names in an assembly not as their saved names....

    ...I create a new part (eg Part51), save it under a new name, relevant to it's part number. ...when I insert it into an assembly, the part name comes up as Part51, not the new name? why is this? ...so I have to rename it in the assy, even though it knows it is linked to that part under it's...
  3. cadjunkie

    creating a solid from a surface back to a plane (V5)....

    ...has anyone else spotted this, or am I missing something? It's a facility in V4, whereby I can choose a surface and an (appropriate) plane and create a solid between the two, in the normal direction of the plane. But, I can't see an icon for it in V5!! I can, of course, get around this, by...
  4. cadjunkie

    V5 - how do I use an existing part passively...

    Thanks Eric! I'm not sure I understand the 2nd part of your reply, about keeping a 'link' - could you expand on the meaning of this; what it does; and on the reasons why this woud be useful? Steve
  5. cadjunkie

    V5 - how do I use an existing part passively...

    ...in CADDS5 I could View-Part; in Catia4 I can activate a part passively and/or use sessions - how to do the same in V5, so that I can 'interact' with an existing part, reference only, such that any info from intersections with or extractions from it, are 'kept' in the 'current/new' part...
  6. cadjunkie

    creating solid part geometry from a surfaced part in V5

    ...also, all the 'ends' of the open surface(s) will need to be co-planar... ...(which, if it's a box, they will be, but then, why would you do it that way... :^ ) ...(ie, the 'solidising' function ['close feature'] won't smooth a 'free-form patch' thro non-coplanar ends of [joined] surfaces, -...
  7. cadjunkie

    Do you use layers in Catia V5 for data segregation?

    It's something I'm looking into also - being used to layers on CADDS5 and Catia4. But, I'm not sure if it's something 'they' really want to bother with. I say that because the documentation on it is not very clear/useful (it seems!) There is a 'box' in the 'graphics' toolbar for naming and...
Back
Top