Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations KootK on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Search results for query: *

  • Users: M_U
  • Order by date
  1. M_U

    SAFE not considering opening in punching calculation when the opening is near the face of column.

    Thanks for the suggestions. I will use Spreadsheet for now. I hope in the latest versions they correct this issue.
  2. M_U

    SAFE not considering opening in punching calculation when the opening is near the face of column.

    Yes, I am expecting from the software to reduce the perimeter by the width of the opening which is 8". But it is not reducing.
  3. M_U

    SAFE not considering opening in punching calculation when the opening is near the face of column.

    Yes, the opening crosses the critical section. As the slab is 8" thick and the opening is 8"x8". It is crossing the critical section.
  4. M_U

    SAFE not considering opening in punching calculation when the opening is near the face of column.

    I have seen this in the manual. But I am confused why the software is not considering the opening just at the face of the column. As I move the opening away from the face of column around "d" distance, it starts considering the opening and reduces the punching perimeter.
  5. M_U

    SAFE not considering opening in punching calculation when the opening is near the face of column.

    I have a small opening which is at the face of the column. While calculating punching shear the software is not reducing the punching perimeter. The size of column is 24" x24". The slab is 8" thick. and the opening is 8"x8". I have attached the screenshots. Does any have idea about this...

Part and Inventory Search