Hi everyone-
We are making the jump from WF 4.0 to Creo 1.0 with Creo 2.0 coming as soon as IT can correct a small issue with the license server (it's about time, right?). I copied my existing config file, start parts, and drawing templates from WF 4.0 to use as a basis for the config for Creo...
Hi-
I am working on an issue that would help improve our productivity here. We have a few assemblies that are ordered with regularity by our clients. We use a part numbering scheme in the form of XXXXX-YYY-ZZZ where XXXXX is a 5 digit project number, YYY is a three letter description or...
Hello all-
I am working in Pro E 4.0 and am instituting a restricted parameter list into our use of Pro E. As I update the restricted values file, I obviously need to update existing parts with the new values as well. To do so, I am using Tools > Parameters and then Tools > Update Restriction...
Hello all-
I was wondering if there is a way to write a logical test in Pro E 4.0 relations that would allow me to perform different actions based on the parameter type. For example: If a parameter called NAME_1 is a string type then it would perform one action but if NAME_1 were a real number...
Hello all-
I was wondering if anyone has a method to make the keyboard shortcuts for the copy and paste functions work in a mapkey. I do not have the ability to use the menus (i.e. Edit>Copy) as I am trying to write a mapkey to copy and paste parameters in a repeat region on a drawing.
I am...
I am trying to combat a problem that we have been fighting for years at my company and need some suggestions. First some background.
We are in the process of implementing an automated system in which the designer outputs the BOM in csv format and links it to a workorder. The system them...
I am working on updating our Pro E standards at my company to fully utilize the parametric ability of the software and have come across a small hiccup. I have created two parameters in each start part called “PID_TOP” and “PID_BOTTOM”. The intent of these string parameters is to hold the...
Hi all-
I have an interesting problem in Pro E 4.0. We have completed some GD&T training at my company and decided to do away with our titleblock tolerances (i.e. x.x = +/- 0.1, x.xx = +/- 0.02, ect) and replace it with a note that says “UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED [profile of surface callout]”...
