Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations cowski on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Search results for query: *

  • Users: FRACH23
  • Content: Threads
  • Order by date
  1. FRACH23

    Welding thick T-joints

    I am asked to support my team in Poland to assemble our own spreader/ lifting beam so we can transfer max of 84-ton tank/horizontal vessel. My exposure was more on industrial/ petrochem facilities but haven't used to welding thick plates. I generally proposed CJP to connect the 50mm top and...
  2. FRACH23

    Isnt Gergely-Lutz procedure only an alternative for ACI350-06?

    In my understanding, stress magnification by durability factor and verification of actual fs of the 2006 edition (ACI 350) had already replaced the z factor procedure by Gergely-Lutz expression of the older edition(as noted by R10.6.4). If such Gergely-Lutz expression had now became only as an...
  3. FRACH23

    How to get flexural stress of a plate modeled counterfort?

    Hi guys. I am trying to make a STAAD model a counterfort geometry as per my attached sketch, but then i was stucked when i was trying to find my bending moment for the cantilever behavior of of the counterfort. Any way staad could give me the stress i...
  4. FRACH23

    concrete cover for liquid-containing facilities

    I have a recent discussion with a consultant about minimum concrete cover for walls for a waste water containing tank. I read in ACI350 it could be only 2", but our Consultant insisted to use 3". We wish to keep my 2" as the code prescribed. I have also some minor low walls inside which is...
  5. FRACH23

    Limiting Compression Soil Spring

    I just wonder how could STAAD consider controlling maximum soil bearing pressure in order to transfer remainder loads in to stiffer support? To make my inquiry more visual, i had a tank illustrated in my attachment, where i have a base slab sitting on fill, while the walls are directly...
  6. FRACH23

    What appropriate load combination for tank leak test

    Hi guys, i was designing a wastewater RC tank on ground. I am taking 1.4(D+F) for operation case, F as fluid load. My design basis calls for American Codes (ASCE. ACI350) and such operation load case is clearly defined. But i could not find in the codes on how to deal with leak test load...
  7. FRACH23

    Existing Mechanical Tower Foundation not following ACI Seismic Detailing Requirement

    Hi guys. I reviewed an existing steel frame tower (for a food processing plant) on piled foundation. My initial check goes fine by strength and serviceability, but i was worried that the RC pedestals did not follow appropriate seismic detailing (located at high seismic risk zone). It was like...
  8. FRACH23

    Redundancy factor for SDC D Non-building structure

    I was caught up in a doubt if my interpretation of ASCE7-10 redundancy factor is correct. I was designing a piperack. As being non-building structure, i took redundancy factor of 1.0 as per Code's Section 12.3.4.1 item 4. However, Section 12.3.4.2 says that if it's at SDC D~F (mine is at SDC...
  9. FRACH23

    End PLate Moment Connection (with Large Moment) for SDC D SMF

    I was designing an end plate moment connection for a SMF Building at SDC D, and having trouble with very large demand moment (3,000 kN-m) due to overstrength. My girder is 800mm deep. I 1. I checked DG and it seems the most i could do was 8 tension bolt connection (2 hor x 4vert each...
  10. FRACH23

    Seismic R Value if column for two mterials

    I was quite confused how to deal with the R value for my roofed footbridge. I have a cantilevered concrete column and had my flooring and roof frame by structural steel. I assume the upper part being steel has different seismic response than than the supporting concrete column. Do i need to...

Part and Inventory Search