Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations cowski on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Search results for query: *

  • Users: quasiblu
  • Content: Threads
  • Order by date
  1. quasiblu

    Overturning checks, buoyant force load factors

    Dear All, using American standards here. For overturning checks, one gets quite different results if he does 1) or 2): 1) Dead*lever / (Moment,wind + Buoy*lever) > SF,min 2) (Dead - Buoy)*lever / Moment,wind > SF,min In my opinion, 1) is the formally correct approach (note that it brings to...
  2. quasiblu

    Response modification factor for vertical vessel on foundation or skirt supported per ASCE 7-16

    Good day, I am trying not much successfully to convince myself that those vertical vessels will perform happily when the following are applied: ** Table 15.4-2, "All steel [...] distributed mass cantilever structures not otherwise covered herein, including [...] skirt-supported vertical vessels...
  3. quasiblu

    Assessment of existing socket for pre-cast concrete column

    Dear All, I am assessing existing sockets per subject for a very small addition on top of a structure and unfortunately I have stumbled upon a wrong rebar detailing for the horizontal bars in the socket walls, internal sides. Let's see if I can paste a sketch. Link The horizontal bars in the...
  4. quasiblu

    Minimum unity check / minimum utilization ratio to justify the response modification coefficient R

    Hi All, I am reading ASCE 7-16 and AISC 341-16. I am dealing with OCBF and OMF, so I have R=3.25-3.50, say R=3. Anyway this post could be extended to concrete SFRS as well. In those codes there's no requirement for designing the foundations for seismic forces stronger than those that the...
  5. quasiblu

    values to seismic weight per ASCE 7-16 to comply with combination values of dead load?

    Hi all, I see that reductions are set for masses in Section 12.7.2, ASCE 7-16 (Effective seismic weight), that's fine, it's related to the likelyhood to have those loads during earthquakes. It's the combinations in Sections 2.3.6 that are not fully clear to me. If I am requested to consider...
  6. quasiblu

    technical reference for sockets for precast columns

    Hi all, could anybody indicate technical references for the structural design of sockets for precast columns (US)? The best would be to find the refs after which a spreadsheet I was provided was made. A couple of formula used: Kn=(Mu/phi)/(b1*(d_eff)^2) rho=0.85*fc/fy*(1-(1-2*Kn/0.85fc)^0.5)...

Part and Inventory Search