Hosking,
I would also recommend you to use the "verification manual" of the related software. there the vendor would have carried out verification of software results with respect to some hand calculations.
Cheers,
Rahul
Sorry, if i am sounding like i am dragging this problem. But i feel that use of padeyes is very commmon engineering application and can warrant a lengthy discussion.
dhengr: I understand your practical suggestions. however, I do not understand the conclusion.
My consideration is that I need to...
thank you JStephen and CaneIT for your replies.
Jstephen: But can we then extrapolate this o say a 25 tonne SWL padeye and then we would have to provide a 50 tonne WLL shackle for the use. Hence, although the solution to use higher rated shackle is practical and will have no problems getting...
If this is in the design stage and it is a large structure such as crane foundation, I would suggest the use of a Deck Insert plate of 25mm.
If this is an existing deck and your application is something like seafastening a unit, i would propose a doubler plate (as BigInch has suggested above) or...
Dear Stephen,
Thank you for your quick response.
for 4.75T shackle (pin diameter = 22.4mm) the padeye hole diameter should be around 23.5mm.
For 12 T shackle (pin diameter = 35.1mm) the padeye hole diameter should be around 37mm
For design with respect to DNV, hole size of padeye cannot be...
Dear engineers,
As per DNV rules, padeye design is suitable for only one shackle size (shackle pin diameter and shackle inside width). Hence, I want to design a padeye (to be marked a SWL of 4.75 tonnes) suitable with 4.75 tonnes WLL standard shackle.
Qusetion 1)
However, when i am supposed to...
