Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

Register Log in
  • Congratulations KootK on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Search results for query: *

  1. digijtal

    RTJ Flanges - Minimum Dimensions when machining PCC-2

    Hi There, Thanks for your reply. I have read section 305-4.5, but it seems that dimensions stated herein are relevant to RF flanges since they will be converted to such. I wonder what the permissible geometries would be for pure RTFs Best regards, Alan
  2. digijtal

    RTJ Flanges - Minimum Dimensions when machining PCC-2

    Good day dear members, I am having some trouble convincing myself that I am understanding ASME PCC-2 well for the repair by machining of RTJ flanges. ASME PCC-2 305-3.1 states the following: "Raised Face Under-thickness of a raised face due to refinishing shall be acceptable, provided the...
  3. digijtal

    Difference between UK & Norwegian FPSOs

    Thanks again biginch. Some very interesting stuff especially in link 2.
  4. digijtal

    Difference between UK & Norwegian FPSOs

    I agree BigInch. But why do all Norwegian FPSOs have bow mounted acc. whilst the British FPSO are a mixture of approx. 40% stern and 60% fwd mounted acc. ? Is there a norwegian regulation which enforces this? Thanks for your fast reply.
  5. digijtal

    Difference between UK & Norwegian FPSOs

    One can note that all Norwegian built FPSOs have forward-mounted accommodation units, whilst UK built FPSOs have a mix of both forward and stern mounted accommodation units. Why is this so? Is there a specific reason for Norwegian fpsos to be built in this manner? (perhaps legislative reason)...

Part and Inventory Search

Back
Top Bottom