Hi
In the code this clause is not totally clear R21.5.4.2
when he calculate MPl, which combinations he used is it the envelope combinations for all cases(gravity +lateral) or envelope for earthquake combinations only
and regarding wu he will take only the combinations for gravity load only or...
KOOTK,
I have to stay, I am so proud of your knowledge and way of thinking..so happy to be here with us in the forum.
Regarding our point,I don't have specific example,I am just try to generate way of thinking, as you said many research has utilize the ability of studs or bond to prevent slip...
Hi guys
We all know the concept of development length for steel bars in concrete(ACI CODE),now of composite beams with I steel beam (AISC)for example if the steel and concrete are acting together using steel concrete bond or using shear studs ,in this case there is no need for development...
Hello Guys
1) I am designing according to the ACI code, but I would like to follow the IBC for earthquake zone design instead of ASCE, so my question if I do so which load combinations I should pick, the one based on IBC,or the one based on ASCE(the same as ACI) to make results consistent or it...
Thank you
Regarding your second point,fy in the development length equation(according to ACI) ,will be replaced fs developed in compression steel,actually this will be the case for all compression development length calculations,am I right?
but stop ,on the other hand the idea for development...
Hello,
1. As far as I know the development length should be developed from both side of the maximum moment point,hence for negative moment for the top steel corner ,we use hook to achieve development form the end corner side and use straight length from the other continuous side
2. If what I...