Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations KootK on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Search results for query: *

  1. struct_eeyore

    min. development length

    Koot - thanks as always. I looked into cylindrical withdrawal, but ACI doesn't appear to provide bond strengths. Based of an internet search, I'm coming up with 350-500 psi - which is roughly what my ultimate load develops. Do you by chance know if there's proper literature that can be used to...
  2. struct_eeyore

    min. development length

    I had a contractor cut off hooks which were vertically restraining a flood proof slab - and of course everything got poured before I had time to digest. Now, it just so happens that I've got just about 12" of embedment of said vertical hooks into the slab. Going thru ACI it looks like we can...
  3. struct_eeyore

    Dropping a client / successor engineer

    Dik - I have, in addition email. I did get the PM on their end to issue a stop work order at first, but they are now proceeding with other parts. I have no reservations about relinquishing the job to another engineer as long as they can ensure everything gets put together correctly. But, since I...
  4. struct_eeyore

    Dropping a client / successor engineer

    I've got a job where a client (a contractor) wishes to move forward with a project faster than I would be able to accommodate them. A substantial portion of said project has already been built, but there are numerous deviations from design drawings which were never run by me, and which need to...
  5. struct_eeyore

    cross grain tens. in built up beam

    Eng and Koot, your effort is much appreciated. This last detail is the way to go.
  6. struct_eeyore

    cross grain tens. in built up beam

    Eng, there will inevitably be shear in the bolts, which will make the edge condition loaded.
  7. struct_eeyore

    cross grain tens. in built up beam

    The load is not great - it's about 350 lbs between the two hangers, the distribution of which will vary depending on the number of plies of blocking. Across the width, I've got about 50lb-ft of moment - cross grain - assuming 3 additional plies (which i suspect will be the maximum necessary)...
  8. struct_eeyore

    cross grain tens. in built up beam

    Jayrod, unfortunately, can't project below the beam - will be sheathed and form the immediate ceiling
  9. struct_eeyore

    cross grain tens. in built up beam

    Koot - I was thinking about a wrap around strap, but I'm concerned that it will inevitably be installed with just enough slack to not engage. I like to think this won't be an issue with a flat strap - maybe if I spec the wrapped strap to be hammered flat at the corners? The couple is only about...
  10. struct_eeyore

    cross grain tens. in built up beam

    I've got condition where I need to support an existing 3-ply 2x8 beam on both sides with hangers - however, the hangers must be spaced such that they can attach to beam clips on an existing WF beam up above, requiring several plies of blocking. (see attached image) The loads overall are not...
  11. struct_eeyore

    Question to Florida engineers

    It's regarding a forensic report I'm putting together for a post hurricane failure. It would help my case to be able to say the building was built per typical construction practice, rather than being an engineered design.
  12. struct_eeyore

    Question to Florida engineers

    pham, Technically yes, but every jurisdiction I've worked with always required architect/engineer stamped drawings. Based on what I've read up on in the last day, the stamp requirements do seem to be very much jurisdiction based - might try calling the county, but I doubt anyone there has any...
  13. struct_eeyore

    Question to Florida engineers

    JAE - correct. I'm working on a residential building from mid 70s and need to know if it would have been built per an engineered design, or just by a contractor, per standard/prescriptive practice
  14. struct_eeyore

    Question to Florida engineers

    Does anyone know when Florida started requiring engineers (or architects) to stamp design drawings for single family homes?
  15. struct_eeyore

    ASCE 7 22 Supplement 2

    Lex - I have some issues with the standard of care around my parts - too many old engineers who keep on doing things they way they have been for the last 40 years, and largely ignoring new codes. Maybe that helps me... but you can always find a pro who could rip those guys (or myself) apart on...
  16. struct_eeyore

    ASCE 7 22 Supplement 2

    Thanks for the input everyone - will be getting some sleep tonight!
  17. struct_eeyore

    ASCE 7 22 Supplement 2

    ASCE released a 'Supplement 2' for 7-22 middle of last year, and it flew completely under my radar. The changes to flood design are huge - as we're now looking at 500 year floods vs 100. I'm practicing in Florida, and we just adopted 7-22 last year. I was only starting to get comfortable with my...
  18. struct_eeyore

    To Florida engineers:

    The limit on cross grain shear at trusses without blocking is something like 60lb.( Don't take my word for it, jumping from memory) There's nothing to be misconstrued when on narrow buildings the diagram shear is commonly 1-2k/ft, and there's no direct load path still. I'll definitely call Miami...
  19. struct_eeyore

    To Florida engineers:

    Can somebody fill me in as to why, at least for residential buildings with wood roofs, continuous load paths from the roof sheathing to the walls are almost always ignored? It's also interesting that the section of the IBC that specifies some typical examples of continuous load...
  20. struct_eeyore

    3/4" metal roof deck

    No - it will be covered w/ densglas, water barrier, and non-structural metal roofing.

Part and Inventory Search