Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations IDS on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Search results for query: *

  1. Lee Saxon

    Y14.5 1994 5.11.1.6 Holes of Different Sizes. Deprecated in 2018?

    Thanks y'all! 10.5.3.4 & Fig 10-52 were exactly what I was looking for!
  2. Lee Saxon

    Y14.5 1994 5.11.1.6 Holes of Different Sizes. Deprecated in 2018?

    Y14.5 1994 5.11.1.6 Holes of Different Sizes states that you can create a FRTZF / Composite Tolerance for features of different sizes (ie ones where you can't simply use one callout with a '2x') by drawing the FCF (plus a notation such as "TWO FEATURES") separately from any size dimensions, and...
  3. Lee Saxon

    Perpendicularity of an Imaginary Line

    Good idea, I've added a PDF of a simple example.
  4. Lee Saxon

    Perpendicularity of an Imaginary Line

    This seems like a pretty straightforward design case if you're trying to orient but not necessarily locate two parts, but it's not something I've ever found a great example for. I've got two holes. An imaginary line drawn between their centers would need to be *oriented* perpendicular to a flat...
  5. Lee Saxon

    Stackup calculations (X min / X max.)

    I mean, what's the definition of "perfect form" here? If the hole tolerance tells me that it applies only when a Ø19+0.5/-0 shaft is at LMC (and therefore "perfect form"), shouldn't that mean only when you've got a perfectly straight Ø19 shaft in which the upper limit doesn't come into play?
  6. Lee Saxon

    Stackup calculations (X min / X max.)

    I'm confused about how we're getting 18.5 from "19 +0.5/-0"?

Part and Inventory Search