Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations KootK on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Search results for query: *

  • Users: breaking_point
  • Order by date
  1. breaking_point

    Damped Natural Frequency

    @JoelTXCive, I actually have been through some nice notes of the undamped free vibration case, but yours are presented so much better that I'm going to use those instead, so thanks! Perhaps I'll make a similarly formatted doc for the damped case and share it back here.
  2. breaking_point

    Damped Natural Frequency

    Hi all, Thanks for the responses. To clarify - no, I don't mean a value of damping. I understand this is impossible to predict and depends on many, many things for a structure (though we know typical ranges for different types of structures). I am referring to the derivation of the natural...
  3. breaking_point

    Damped Natural Frequency

    Hey, I've always been curious as to how the damped natural frequency is derived: ωd = ωn sqrt(1−ξ^2) Does anyone have any literature? Is it empirical based on experiments? Thanks
  4. breaking_point

    RC Slab

    A couple of times on my internship I've had to design a simply supported slab over one span which I conservatively treated as one-way spanning. I calculated the amount of steel required in tension, and the senior engineer told me to specify the same steel top and bottom. When I thought about...
  5. breaking_point

    RC Slab

    When designing a RC slab, it is typical to spec the same reinforcement top and bottom. When analyzing this section, do you assume the concrete contributes nothing (i.e. a neutral axis of 0) when analyzing the stress blocks as the compression steel would balance the tension steel? As such, the...
  6. breaking_point

    ULS design question

    Dik, Kootk, thanks for the literature. I'll read through them this weekend! Cheers.
  7. breaking_point

    Timber Beam in Torsion

    @WARose, Please could you elaborate? My thoughts were that the torsion would act around the centroid of the beam (where the bolts connect), and the top plane of the beam would try and twist left, while the bottom plane would twist right. I thought that the axial stiffness would prevent the top...
  8. breaking_point

    Timber Beam in Torsion

    Hey. I have attached an image of my query. I have timber beams that support decking that is tied into the beams using lag screws that provide lateral restraint. Attached to the left support beam is a post at approx 1m c/c along the length of the beam. The design code requires me to check...
  9. breaking_point

    ULS design question

    Hi Dik. That was very well explained (and I was able to follow it!), thank you. I will take a look into shake down behaviour and see if I can further my understanding a little more.
  10. breaking_point

    ULS design question

    @KootK, forgive my crude drawing (from MS Paint haha!) but I thought this might illustrate my thoughts better to see if I am on the right track. If the moment rotation capacity of a section is plotted in black, with (phi)Mp representing the ultimate capacity we design it for (assuming section 1...
  11. breaking_point

    ULS design question

    @jayrpd12, My apologies, I don't think I explained myself clearly in my first post. I understand the principle you outlined in your post. However, I was asking whether it is of concern that it is possible that section undergo loading that would take it beyond the yield point but within the...
  12. breaking_point

    ULS design question

    Hey everyone. I have a question regarding ultimate limit state design. Using this method, we calculate member capacities based on their maximum plastic capacities. We then select member parameters based on the factored loads and materials, so that the materials do not reach failure during their...
  13. breaking_point

    Maximum allowable reinforcement strain

    @Celt83, Excellent! Thanks for the response. I figured that the minimum reinforcement equations would typically limit the steel from developing too much strain, but couldn't find any solid data.
  14. breaking_point

    Maximum allowable reinforcement strain

    Hey. So I'm looking at RC beam design, and I'm aware that beams are typically designed to be tension controlled, i.e. at the concrete rupture strain (0.0035), the steel should be beyond the yield strain. I've read that it is good to aim to have the steel strain at around 0.005-0.008 when the...
  15. breaking_point

    Reinforced concrete beam - question about theory

    @canwesteng, As you said, the cracked concrete would reduced the stiffness of the connection, so would the beam begin to behave more like a pinned connection? (I understand in reality there is no such thing as a 'pinned' connection, as connections are always some form of semi-rigid).
  16. breaking_point

    Reinforced concrete beam - question about theory

    Hey everyone. Thanks for the comments. Just to clarify, I'm not actually designing a member, it's just a thought that has been in my head and I wanted to discuss it with you all. To put my point question another way... If I was designing a steel beam that was to be post-anchored between two RC...
  17. breaking_point

    Reinforced concrete beam - question about theory

    Hi, If I choose to design a reinforced concrete beam as simply supported (generally conservative), but it is in reality connected to a column in a more rigid connection, do I need to theoretically need to provide reinforcement on the top side of the beam? I know that the beam will want to go...
  18. breaking_point

    Confirmation about failure theories and Von Mises

    271828 - Thank you for the reply! Please could you elaborate why we aren't interested in yielding? If we were to design a steel beam (assuming fully restrained and shear is not an issue), we could size it based on the sigma = MY/I equation, where we could calculating a resisting moment and the...
  19. breaking_point

    Confirmation about failure theories and Von Mises

    Hi Dik, I appreciate the reply! I read that ductile materials are typically governed by their shear strength, and in a uni-axial test of steel, the specimen normally ruptures along a 45 degree plane (the maximum shear plane). However, in the way typical structures are design normal stresses...
  20. breaking_point

    Confirmation about failure theories and Von Mises

    I've been learning about failure theories of materials, namely the Von Mises and Tresca theories. I read that these theories are used because the accuracy of just comparing the yield stress to the maximum yield for a uni-axial test in insufficient in more complex stress states. One thing I did...

Part and Inventory Search