Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations GregLocock on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Search results for query: *

  • Users: PDH95
  • Order by date
  1. PDH95

    316L vs. 316Ti, high temperatures (~600ºC), welded parts

    About 310 I found this statement "Exposure in temperature range 450-850ºC results in sensitization, hence reducing subsequent wet corrosion resistance". What do you think about that? Maybe 310S can solve this problem, if it is true.
  2. PDH95

    316L vs. 316Ti, high temperatures (~600ºC), welded parts

    And considering that there is standard air, just heated, around the piece, something like a 304L can be a good choice? Well, maybe there is a little higher humidity than outside the furnace.
  3. PDH95

    316L vs. 316Ti, high temperatures (~600ºC), welded parts

    Thank you for your answers! EdStainless, it's a cyclic exposure. I don't know if there exists another alloy that avoids that spalling issue. I'm thinking on 309, 310, 321, ... but maybe with these alloys is difficult to find tube products, and the costs rise heavily. blacksmith37, maybe the...
  4. PDH95

    316L vs. 316Ti, high temperatures (~600ºC), welded parts

    Hi, I have read some information about the differences between 316L and 316Ti performances at high temperatures but I have some doubts yet. In our application, we have a kind of table made from a tube welded to a plate. That table is going to be at a high-temperature ambient (around 600 ºC) and...

Part and Inventory Search