Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations The Obturator on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Search results for query: *

  1. DanAndrews

    Weird Results from ETABS

    I see. Thank you very much!
  2. DanAndrews

    Weird Results from ETABS

    Thank you. Do you know why the moment 2-2 in the pier results still show 0?
  3. DanAndrews

    Weird Results from ETABS

    Okay I found what the problem is now. I think this is what Agent666 is refer to. The last box should be uncheck.... Any way that I can keep the horizontal edge restraints only?
  4. DanAndrews

    Weird Results from ETABS

    Hi MSUK90, e2k uploaded.https://files.engineering.com/getfile.aspx?folder=60066076-9e42-4234-87bc-195b50dd9e87&file=TEST.e2k
  5. DanAndrews

    Weird Results from ETABS

    Thank you Agent666. Sorry was meant to upload M22 instead of M11. See below. Yes it is a two way shell but only 4 end nodes are restrained so at the end of the day it will still behave more like a simply supported beam span vertically because there is no restrained along two vertical edges of...
  6. DanAndrews

    Weird Results from ETABS

    Sure MSUK90. Just uploaded. Thanks. I am trying to get the out-of-plane moment of wall under wind load but had this kinda of issue in my model so I simplified the model to see what happened. https://files.engineering.com/getfile.aspx?folder=b2ff5fb5-6106-409a-b5c1-bc5b39536c53&file=TEST.EDB
  7. DanAndrews

    Weird Results from ETABS

    I have this 4m x 10m tall wall modelled in ETABS with 4 end nodes restrained and 1kPa area load applied at out-of-plane direction. I was expecting the the bending moment at mid-span to be around 1*10^2/8 = 12.5kNm/m. However when I went to Moment 22 for piers it shows nearly 0 and M11 for shell...
  8. DanAndrews

    Area load distribution of closed polygon

    Thanks Tomfh. If it is based on 'nearest neighbour' to get the distributed load then I agree it is not the 'correct' way to get distributed loads but I am just wondering if this is the way all these FE softwares deal with load distribution (ETABS for example) when we assign 'membrane' or 'deck'...
  9. DanAndrews

    Area load distribution of closed polygon

    Thanks Celt83. I am actually more interested in two way load distribution mechanism. ie. calculate how much load each premier beam gets from a closed polygon with uniform area load. The following is an example showing what I want to do. I couldn't find more resources explaining how load is...
  10. DanAndrews

    Area load distribution of closed polygon

    Does anyone know how to calculate the load distributed to the perimeter beams that form a closed polygon of any shape not just rectangular? Any textbooks recommend? (I tried to search but no luck so far) I read the support documents from RISA 3D and looks like they use finite meshes but I...
  11. DanAndrews

    Is this connection doable?

    Let's say the spacing between top & bottom studs is 70mm, leaving 40mm edge distance for the studs, which is too small? I believe for rebars we can use bond strength instead so breakout is not an issue here while it is not the case for studs/anchors?
  12. DanAndrews

    Is this connection doable?

    Thank you dik. Like I said, I have this scenario for my cantilever facade to 150 precast wall as well. Do you think it is practical to locally thicken my precast walls at ends or can I make a stiffer EA or other steel like I proposed at the beginning to do the same work? Also, won't it be...
  13. DanAndrews

    Is this connection doable?

    Thanks dik. Is this the one you are proposing? I can make the slab thicker or have a step as what you proposed. The reason I didn't want to do this was because I have cantilever facades like this canopy that is connecting to the 150 precast walls under for this project as well. So even if I...
  14. DanAndrews

    Is this connection doable?

    Thank you. Can you please explain why it is not gonna work? I would expect T/C to form a moment connection here. Cables cannot be used here unfortunately. By box section you mean replace the EA with SHS?
  15. DanAndrews

    Is this connection doable?

    Hi fellows, I have this 3.8m cantilever canopy to design. I am going to use 150SHS @ 1m spacing by using the fix connection to slab. There is 60 set down. I am proposing the following connection to do the moment connection work. The design moment is 7.5kNm per SHS. Then I am assuming the level...
  16. DanAndrews

    Question on PCI handbook example

    Thank you for your help I still don't fully understand. Lets ignore the combined check for shear and focus on moment only for now. I would consider the e from V* to the start point of weld to get the tension and compression. And then check the weld to the tension & compression as well as the...
  17. DanAndrews

    Question on PCI handbook example

    Does anyone know why the eccentricity is taken as joint plus plate width when checking the rebar capacity in PCI handbook wall-wall shear connection example? Shouldn't e be joint only?

Part and Inventory Search