Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations SDETERS on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Search results for query: *

  1. ChiEngr

    ASCE 113 - 100/40/40 rule

    Thank you for your response. If you do end up getting more information, I would be happy to hear and learn.
  2. ChiEngr

    Drilled Pier Frost Heave

    Thanks BAretired!
  3. ChiEngr

    Drilled Pier Frost Heave

    Do you have a specific product in mind?
  4. ChiEngr

    Drilled Pier Frost Heave

    Diameter of the pier is 2.5 ft, depth to frost is 3.5 ft - which results in an upward load (based on circumference of the pier) of around 44 kips. I would have to go very deep in the shaft embedment below the frost depth to get an adequate uplift resistance via skin friction.
  5. ChiEngr

    Drilled Pier Frost Heave

    Hello, I am currently designing concrete drilled piers, and per the geotech report, the recommendations incur a 1600 psf design stress for potential frost heave. The recommendations also state that placing friction reducing material can be considered as an alternate option to prevent damage...
  6. ChiEngr

    ASCE 113 - 100/40/40 rule

    Hello, I am designing a substation support structure, and I was wondering if anybody had any guidance or experience with orthogonal combination of seismic loads when using the Equivalent Lateral Force procedure. Per ASCE 113, Section 3.1.7.8, it states a series of design load combinations using...
  7. ChiEngr

    Bar Grating Stair Treads

    Thanks for the feedback!
  8. ChiEngr

    Bar Grating Stair Treads

    Hello, I am designing an exterior steel stair and was looking to implement bar grating treads with end carrier plates containing holes for 3/8" bolts. I know I am dealing with very little load, but I am wondering if others have specified a 3/8" hot-dipped galvanized bolt in the past? What grade...
  9. ChiEngr

    Beam to HSS Column Connection via WT

    Thanks, KootK. This is actually what I am planning on doing barring the calcs working out.
  10. ChiEngr

    Beam to HSS Column Connection via WT

    Hello, I am working on a WF beam to HSS column connection that I am hoping to achieve through a WT element. My question is with regards to whether it is reasonable to assume this connection to be "pinned." The connection is subject to axial force, vertical shear force, and horizontal...
  11. ChiEngr

    Pile Pushover Analysis and p-y curves

    I have a question regarding lateral pile analysis that I am trying to wrap my head around. I have an analysis of a single drilled shaft that I am working on using LPile. I performed a pushover analysis to see at what level of pile head displacement that a plastic hinge would develop in the...
  12. ChiEngr

    Concrete strut connection at top of wall

    I am way good in punching shear. Part of the reason is because the walls are 12" thick and the axial demands are around 30 kips. If this strut was fixed-fixed, the moment would be less than 10 kip-ft. I am not too concerned about punching. I was just conceptually trying to figure out the best...
  13. ChiEngr

    Concrete strut connection at top of wall

    The structure is a bio-retention structure consisting of perimeter walls and supporting footings. I implemented concrete struts along the wall length in order to mitigate the size of the footings. The size of the footings would be prohibited by large existing utilities, so this was the best...
  14. ChiEngr

    Concrete strut connection at top of wall

    Thanks for the response Koot. The strut is between two walls receiving roughly equal lateral earth pressure. That is the source of the compression in the member. Do you have any thoughts on #3 above? Does my question make sense?
  15. ChiEngr

    Concrete strut connection at top of wall

    Hello, I have posted about this before, but had to make some design changes. I have a concrete strut (primarily an axial member and taking small flexural demand) which needs to be shifted up towards the top the wall it connects to. I have the following questions: 1. For this strut to behave as...
  16. ChiEngr

    Concrete beam to concrete wall fixity

    @JAE and @Greenalleycat, Thanks for your responses. I ended up enveloping the solution and analyzed the strut as being pinned-pinned as well. I probably will end up concentrating some additional vertical bars in the wall over a 2'-0" width where my strut comes in. I also used a smaller bar size...
  17. ChiEngr

    Concrete beam to concrete wall fixity

    HTURKAK, Here is a sketch of my condition/connection. I am wondering if the negative moment can be transferred into the wall with the reinforcing layout shown. That is what I am debating.
  18. ChiEngr

    Concrete beam to concrete wall fixity

    Hello, I am designing a strut between two retaining wall structures for reasons I won't get into in this post. My question is the following: The beam end will have some fixity at the wall interface. However, I am wondering if a conventionally reinforced wall will be able to resist that moment...
  19. ChiEngr

    FEM Out-of-plane shear results

    Im using RISA-3D, concrete is the material. Its a large box type structure I am analyzing (bio-retention structure). SWComposites: I'm sorry, that is what I meant by summing the Qx and Qy (vectorially).
  20. ChiEngr

    FEM Out-of-plane shear results

    Thank you; I have seen other threads on here where people have advocated for treating Qx and Qy independently and I have been getting confused accordingly. My out-of-plane shear capacity is the same for both bending directions so I believe the sum of Qx and Qy is certainly appropriate.

Part and Inventory Search