Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

Search results for query: *

  • Users: mte12
  • Order by date
  1. mte12

    Silo quaking in design of bins and suppport structure

    . Thanks for additional comments human909.
  2. mte12

    Silo quaking in design of bins and suppport structure

    OK thanks human909, understand given the complexity. Will have to figure out what to do with excitation and fatigue.
  3. mte12

    Silo quaking in design of bins and suppport structure

    Thanks for responding human909. This is a new design and I don't have a feel if it's a problem or not. Was hoping for practical examples to illustrate what's done in design, understand there is difficulty in determining if quaking is an issue.
  4. mte12

    Silo quaking in design of bins and suppport structure

    Hi, just wondering what people have done for design of bin and structure, as it relates to silo quaking. BS EN 1991-4 mentions it but says standard is limited for this. Failures have occurred, recall reading that in one instance failure occurred after one week of operation. Wondering what's...
  5. mte12

    Design method for rock bolts in shear

    Thanks for the additional comments. It is difficult to come up to speed on this as there is very little prescriptive information out there.
  6. mte12

    Design method for rock bolts in shear

    Thanks for responses. azcats, I believe bolt orientation is typically normal to face. human909, the embedment length is of the order of 1m to 2m, Geotechnical Strength Index is 1, Young's Modulus 15GPa.
  7. mte12

    Design method for rock bolts in shear

    For a structure supported on rock, which experiences shear load only, is there a design method available for design of rock bolts. The steel structure would be supported on either pedestals or a slab on top of the rock. All of the literature that I've come across so far only deals with tension...
  8. mte12

    Capacity of I-beam as a cantilever

    Thanks for comments. Just to be clear, regarding last 2 posts, the case considered is for beam overhang past another member with and without partial rotation restraint (and with load at top ... destabilising). The effective length is 5.0L and 7.5L respectively from BS 5950-1/SCI P360. AS 4100...
  9. mte12

    Capacity of I-beam as a cantilever

    Thanks Lomarandil, the comments above assist. Unfortunately cannot design out the condition in this instance. Understand that 2L is often correct ... for the case with a cantilever with a fixed base (restrained laterally, torsionally and against rotation on plan), AS 4100 agrees with BS...
  10. mte12

    Capacity of I-beam as a cantilever

    Other attachment ...https://files.engineering.com/getfile.aspx?folder=990195cd-a404-461f-b354-6e5a4692a4bf&file=Question.pdf
  11. mte12

    Capacity of I-beam as a cantilever

    In considering the capacity of a cantilever I-beam in bending, I looked at the following standards: AS 4100, BS 5950-1:2000 & SCI publication P360. Could anyone shed light on the following questions. Assume case of a cantilever segment extending past another beam, with partial torsional...
  12. mte12

    Deflection criteria for bulk handling machines

    Has anyone come across lateral deflection criteria for bulk handling machines such as stackers, reclaimers, trippers, etc. This is to check supporting structure to BS EN. Is it the norm that deflection from machine loads only are considered, or wind load as well. Does requirement come form...
  13. mte12

    Deflection of concrete pile - inertia of pile

    Has anyone come across some worked examples for deflection/rotation checks for concrete piles. Piles are integrated with tie beams for information. Looked at Pile Design and Construction Practice from Tomlinson and Woodward. In page 346, mention is made for assuming 50% inertia relative to...
  14. mte12

    Allowable lateral deflection bored/CFA piles

    Thanks for confirming.
  15. mte12

    Allowable lateral deflection bored/CFA piles

    Thanks HTURKAK. I presume this would be for ultimate loads, such as a storm wind event?
  16. mte12

    Allowable lateral deflection bored/CFA piles

    Thanks EireChch. Have you come across any publicly available criteria or specification that could be used in a calculation.
  17. mte12

    Allowable lateral deflection bored/CFA piles

    I was wondering if there's a reference for accepted lateral deflection at top of concrete pile, either bored or CFA, pile head is approximately at ground level. Assuming it's dependent on type of structure supported, possibly it's height. For reference structure supported is a steel building...
  18. mte12

    Piled foundation with tie beams

    Thanks for response JLNJ. Can you please explain further on "force the entire structure to act as one unit".
  19. mte12

    Piled foundation with tie beams

    Thanks HTURKAK, the assumption will be for a pinned column base, and also top of pile is pinned, so the moment is supposed to be transferred from pedestal into tie beams. Only thing is, without the experience I'm wondering why I don't see much mention of this load path, after a reasonably...
Back
Top