Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations KootK on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Search results for query: *

  1. rfkflf

    Is the profile tolerance on my cone fully defined?

    Burunduk, Ok thank you! I'll use the gauge line idea just because it feels wrong to dimension twice. Although technically I still feel it is correct to have a TED and a linear dimension because they are being used for separate requirements and in the end both requirements need to pass for the...
  2. rfkflf

    Is the profile tolerance on my cone fully defined?

    Thank you for the replies. Burunduk: so are you saying to dimension the cone base twice? one TED and one linear? I ended up dimensioning to the apex of the cone. But the question still stands if "legally" i can dimension twice in these kinds of situations. Although i dont have another example...
  3. rfkflf

    Is the profile tolerance on my cone fully defined?

    Hi All, Having this debate at work. We use ISO GPS (BS 8888) but happy to hear how it applies to ASME Y14.5, I am sure it's not that different. Problem: How to fully define the profile/surface tolerance of a cone? As you can see from the image attached (apologies for using paint), I am trying...

Part and Inventory Search