The part isn't totally symmetrical, which you can probably tell from the the little detail to the left
But the side edge in the view shown is exactly the same, which is why I was wondering if it is even logical to "2X" a dimension as such, maybe I am missing something.
That's interesting, haven't seen the it done like that before. I did some research and found this example "http://www.dimcax.com/gdt_web/march-01.htm" which helps explains it a bit. From this I feel the 2X should instead go along the word "INDIVIDUALLY" rather than the feature control frame
So...
I am little new to GD&T, and haven't used it with a multiplier to indicate instances before, normally I would just mark them independently but due to space issues in this drawing I want to keep it clean and neat.
My question is, am I using it correctly, the intention is to portray that both...
