Search results for query: *

Haha! :-D

Hmm....ok....yes I was aware of the offset tolerance thing but I have never used it. I think I need to digest it a little more before I dare use it on a drawing since I have to explain it later to the people that will manufacture the component :-D Thanks :-)

Thanks everyone the answers :-) An axial Circular runout, yes, that could also work I think? 3DDave, I am not sure I follow, if you have the time to make a quick sketch I am interested.

Forgot the datums and could not edit the link https://files.engineering.com/getfile.aspx?folder=1208fffe-d641-4cc8-b38f-b813e380de51&file=flatness_profile_of_line_2.png

Yes, I accidently picked the wrong symbol :-) Ah, yes, ok. What do you think about this? A general flatness for the whole surface and then profile of line for each 200mm of each circular...

Ops! Of course, sorry! It's Friday, apparently I have already checked out :-D

Or like this, looks a bit more clean?https://files.engineering.com/getfile.aspx?folder=6502026d-34e0-4619-a6f1-91c4268ccc5a&file=profile_of_line_2.png

Thanks for the answer :-) Do you mean something like this? (see attachment). I would for the circular element have liked to write it as "0.5 / 0.2/200" but that looks a bit messy....?https://files.engineering.com/getfile.aspx?folder=42e10f67-47c7-4404-be1a-0a1f7248c342&file=profile_of_line_1.png

I want to put a flatness requirement on a circular plate, see attached picture. I want to have for example 0,5 as a general flatness for the complete surface but in tangential direction it must not be more than 0,2 per 200mm. I am fine with it being conical up to 0,5 though. I've been looking...