Hello everyone,
I am trying to present the Plant Simulation programme in a course. I would like to build something with the programme. I have decided in favour of this simulation:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f8SsmHisaXo&list=PLYmizvoOkKeZ0UlSY_yl6E9NX1y2dAUuR&index=24
I set everything up...
i'm not interested in proving the opposite. i'm interested in a clear, simple machining example that makes it clear that hard turning is more flexible. Let's forget the example picture for the moment. in the video...
In this video it looks like it is not necessary to dress. Check last step.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HNlGvJ4Gm7Q&ab_channel=WEMAGlauchau-BRANDOFTHENSHGROUP
@Heaviside1925 thank you very much for your answer. The repeated dressing required is a very good way of describing the flexibility in this example. But do you actually have to align the disc again and again after each step/face? I would have thought that you only do this when you replace a disc...
@Heaviside1925 There will be unevenness in the grinding wheel because the marked areas are not in contact in the one process. However, this can be restored by a dressing process and the workpiece can still be machined in one clamping and one tool or not?
@BrianE22 look at the photo I uploaded. It shows that you can also use a grinder for surface turning. So this example raises the question of what the difference in flexibility is?
I also have another example: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YAyd7vkHRXs&ab_channel=EMAG
Although 2 tools are...
I am currently working on a presentation on hard turning. My part is to compare hard turning with grinding in various aspects. One of them is "flexibility". I have found a lot of articles and literature saying that hard turning is more flexible than grinding. The only problem is, after a lot of...
