@goutam_freelance
Yes, I found these records in D10.10. They are practically the same as in the case of ASME section I. However, the customer specification imposes a completely different way of placing and number of thermocouples. Hence my question, are the guidelines from ASME (section I and...
Hi,
I understand that you are qualifying according to ASME s.IX?
Is impact strength required? If not, the qualification range will be 5-31.76mm.
If impact strength is required, then you actually need a thinner coupon.
I did exactly the same on a PED project and neither the notified body nor...
@r6155
Thank you for your reply. All standards are clear and simple when you have experience working with them. If you have such, please confirm whether I have interpreted them correctly.
1. In s.I(2021) in Appendix VIII, the exact location and number of thermocouples are given in the drawings...
@hacksaw
By "heating element" they mean each heating mat. That is why performing PWHT with these guidelines in the case of large diameter pipes requires the use of a large number of mats.
@r6155
Sorry, I wasn't sure which section to ask this question in.
Hello engineers,
I am starting work on boiler pipelines according to ASME section I and B31.1. We will weld pipes with P no. 4, 5A and 15E with quite large diameters (up to 813 mm) and thicknesses (up to 57 mm). In his specification, the client specified the number of monitoring thermocouples...
Hello engineers,
I am starting work on boiler pipelines according to ASME section I and B31.1. We will weld pipes with P no. 4, 5A and 15E with quite large diameters (up to 813 mm) and thicknesses (up to 57 mm). In his specification, the client specified the number of monitoring thermocouples...
