We build a lot of 2' and 3' wide walkways with the 2.0 psf and 3.14 psf grating (respectively) using reverse diamond grating and spanning the width of the walkways. Doesn't require intermediate support that way. We've seen a few people make them similarly w/o the reverse diamond and they're...
I'd be interested in seeing how my structure reacted/deflected with the roller assumption and how much thrust it was actually resisting w/o the roller.
My gut says use the roller or bracket the system w/ and w/o.
If it's stable otherwise and you're comfortable w/ the loading atop the...
I left everything fixed.
The big reaction is about 25 kip-ft (ASD). Thrust force of about 6 kips.
Some other weird internal moments with the fixity. I just tried releasing the torsion at the baseplate and it didn't impact much.
Regarding the angle, I don't know that they make a 7x4...
So I got bored...
Caveats:
Ignored tapers
60 psf LL
20 psf DL (plus self weight)
No members are 'overstressed' per-se. 8x8 are in the high 80's. 12x4 is in the low 80's. I don't trust my risa skills enough with cantilevered members to really report on the double angle.
Deflection over 2"...
Wonder if the center has more or less flex than the ends? IE, how torsionally stiff is that 12 x 4 HSS? Maybe the small HSS at the end mitigates some of that.
I share others' concerns about the AB size/embed. Also curious about the welding of the angle to the HSS.
I've successfully used it to quickly generate complex, multi-layered if formulae in excel. Just kept feeding it a word salad of what I wanted and we eventually got it tailored to work perfectly. Done in 5 minutes what would have taken me an hour to organize the logic in excel myself.
I have different thoughts on this depending on the use of the foundations. If they're primarily/only vertically loaded and the expected use is the same, I'd be more lenient than if they're part of some lateral system for a load they likely have not yet seen in their lifetime.
IBC Section 1807.3 has the formulae. 1807.3.2.1
Note that the soil characteristic here is passive pressure - not vertical bearing. I'd expect to see something more like 200 psf/ft. Using that I get 5.78' deep...
I'd generally put the wall height at the elevation of the drag strut or collector. And if that's the top plate at the top of wall, so be it. In that case you've probably (hopefully) got shear transfer from diaphragm to top plate the length of the wall. If not, I could be talked out of my...
I've said it before on this subject, I do ignore the 0.6D combinations for soil pressure calculations on isolated foundations resisting overturning. I do ensure that any 0.9D combinations have a OT FoS of at least 1.5. And I ensure the structure is still stable at 0.6D combinations.
These...
Side face blowout is more of a pseudo-pressure failure than a tensile cone failure. It appears as a cone-ish because of how it fails.
If your scale is accurate I'd likely ignore based on it not really being a free edge and where the 'pressure' originates is well restrained by a significant...
I'm betting uplift removed the diaphragm and any chance those walls had to stay standing.
Those panelized roofs were spongy - worked on a couple of them right out of school in the early 90s. I don't remember considering uplift. 2x4 joists spanning 8'.