Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

Register Log in
  • Congratulations waross on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Search results for query: *

  1. chas49

    weld type 310 ss fittings directly to SA 213 gr T91 .180" wall tube

    Thanks stanweld & metengr. This will help me to justify this method as primarily safe and very cost effective. Regards, Chas49
  2. chas49

    weld type 310 ss fittings directly to SA 213 gr T91 .180" wall tube

    Should I weld type 310 ss fittings directly to SA 213 gr T91 .180" wall tube using ERNiCr3 or overlay the attachment areas with ERNiCr3 first. Note that the attachments are fairly small (slip spacers) and need a 1/4" fillet.
  3. chas49

    ASME IX P# issue

    Thanks gentlemen. Sort of what I guessed I will have to do but you can't blame a guy for trying.
  4. chas49

    ASME IX P# issue

    We have inadvertantly used an AISI 1006 material for membrane attachment to waterwall tubes. We normally use 1008 or 1018 which are P#1 materials in ASME IX. Although AISI or SAE 1006 is listed as ASME 5041 in SA29 of section II A we cannot find an assignable P# in ASME IX for procedural...
  5. chas49

    ASME 1 PW 53.9

    I'm doing a vessel test plate that is 4.7" thick and has to be tested to PW 53.9. Everything is pretty standard with exception to the bend test. 53.9.1 says the width of the transverse bend specimen is to be 1.5 "T" which makes the specimen width 7". Is this the true intent?
  6. chas49

    SA 299 Carbon equivalency

    Have been offered by mill 6.5" Tk. SA 299 with CE of .57. Our MOS asked for max of .55. Should we be concerned with weldability ?

Part and Inventory Search

Back
Top