I have heard in the past that because Pro/M is not ideal for non-linear analysis that it is a poor software choice for BUCKELING. I have also read this at another post and noticed that one person has commented in this way. Can I get any other comments on this issue?
Thanks,
Brian
You mentioned that RASNA was wasted on Pro-E, Does this mean that you feel Pro-E is not the Solid modeling program that one should consider?
Thanks for your comment.
I appreciate all of the comments and am looking forward to more. Fatigue will probably not be an issue but I am still uncertain on my decision for FEA. Did Pro/M improve along with the new version of Wildfire Pro/E?
Thanks,
Brian
I have been researching Solids and FEA software and have narrowed it down to PRO E for solids and Mechanica and Ansys for fea. I only need analysis software to handle static forces, motor vibration and possibly fatigue. I would appreciate any comments on FEA and Pro-E for solids.
