Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

Search results for query: *

  1. bgsmith

    Steel Pipe Pile Foundation Design

    rbudiman: Thanks for the responses. Do you have a code reference that indicates the overstrength factor requirement for the foundation design? It is clearly noted for battered pile systems in ASCE 7-10 but I could not find that requirement for typical pile systems. I don't know what is...
  2. bgsmith

    Steel Pipe Pile Foundation Design

    I am designing a pile foundation for a new building based on information provided by the geotechnical engineer for the project. The pile foundation is required due to the high probability of liquefaction of the underlying soil during a seismic event. The pile system proposed consists of 8"...
  3. bgsmith

    Existing Masonry Shear Wall SDC D

    jdgengineer: What you laid out is the same way I was reading the code. In my case we will be decreasing the capacity of the existing shear walls by more than 10% by cutting in new windows and doors and/or adding load to the walls by a new sprinkler system and mechanical units. If it is an...
  4. bgsmith

    Existing Masonry Shear Wall SDC D

    I have a project that is a remodel of an existing one-story masonry building with wood rafter roof framing. The building is located in seismic design category D region. The existing masonry walls have horizontal reinforcing consisting of ladder joint reinforcing only and vertical rebar spacing...
  5. bgsmith

    Unenclosed Roof at Property Line

    I have designed at least two canopies in different jurisdictions where they required a fire rated wall to be constructed along property line where the canopy roof was closer than 10 feet from the property line. The justification was that if combustible items were stored under the canopy then...
  6. bgsmith

    Unenclosed Roof at Property Line

    stookeyfpe: do you have a code reference for an exception for canopies? I haven't been able to find anything and most jurisdictions that we deal with treat any structure with a roof as a building.
  7. bgsmith

    Unenclosed Roof at Property Line

    Thanks Ron. What if the structure is less than 5 feet from another building or the property line?
  8. bgsmith

    Unenclosed Roof at Property Line

    I have designed several roof structures that are open canopies (no walls) near property lines. Every jurisdiction seems to have a different interpretation of fire rating requirements for these structures. Does anybody have any code sections or ideas on if fire rating is required, fire...
  9. bgsmith

    Enercalc Masonry Slender Wall

    I have been using the newer version of Enercalc (version 6) for a variety of designs. I noticed when using the masonry wall design module that some of the results didn't look correct. The axial stress and calculated deflections look much higher than calculated using rough hand calcs. Has...
  10. bgsmith

    Masonry Column Lateral Design

    Sorry if I didn't state it clearly but the primary design issue is the design of the footing. The masonry column is of sufficient size to resist lateral but the footing fails in overturning and soil bearing. For a simple example the column is 12 feet tall and has 1040 s.f. of tributary area to...
  11. bgsmith

    Masonry Column Lateral Design

    a2mfk: Using a HSS column wrapped with CMU was an alternate I thought of. However due to the added cost and the inefficient use of not being able to use the existing masonry columns to resist lateral I have been looking for an alternate solution. Sandman: Thanks for that code reference. I am...
  12. bgsmith

    Masonry Column Lateral Design

    I am having trouble in the design of a cantilevered masonry column system. These systems seem to be pretty typical for support of entry canopies or even larger canopy systems (I am picturing bank drive throughs). The basic system is a light roof deck (metal deck or plywood) with light framing...
  13. bgsmith

    Air Entrainment with Waterproofing Admixtures

    Thanks for all of the input. I thought it wasn't an air entrainment problem but wanted to see if anyone else has had that problem. I agree that using a coating may work at the time of construction but you don't have any guarantee it will be maintained.
  14. bgsmith

    Air Entrainment with Waterproofing Admixtures

    The admixture being used is Rheomac. Lots of local contractors are using concrete sealant or admixtures similar to Rheomac in place of air entrainment. The thought being that water won't be able to get into the concrete so it is not considered an exterior surface. I was looking for a code...
  15. bgsmith

    Air Entrainment with Waterproofing Admixtures

    Yes, the air entrainment is for frost/freeze exposure as required for severe exposure with 3/4" aggregrate by ACI 318 section 4.4.1. The air entrainment used is approx 6%. I have not seen the surface in question personally but the pictures indicate and the contractor is saying that the air...
  16. bgsmith

    Electronic Plan Review

    Many building departments are switching to electronic plan review programs to reduce paper and hopefully to make the review process more efficient. My question is how this works with requirements for orginal stamps on the construction drawings. How are design professionals insuring that their...
  17. bgsmith

    Air Entrainment with Waterproofing Admixtures

    I have an exterior concrete wall that is specified to have a waterproofing admixture in the mix design. The contractor built a mock wall and with the air entrainment added they can't get a finish that the owner will accept. Does anyone know of an alternate method of waterproofing (either with...
  18. bgsmith

    Metal Building Anchorage to Concrete

    ARKeng: The 2.5 factor is in the IBC portion of our code (1908.1.16)that deals with concrete. I don't know if this is a state specific revision or general IBC revision. To resist the uplift forces I have been including a portion of the slab above which helps. You are right though that...
  19. bgsmith

    Steel Building Anchorage with Uplift Forces

    If you use hairpins and supplementary reinforcement to develop forces in your footings does the ductile steel failure requirement of ACI 318 D3.3.4 still apply? I know this appendix only deals with un-reinforced concrete anchorage but it doesn't seem like adding hairpins or additional steel...
  20. bgsmith

    Steel Building Anchorage with Uplift Forces

    It is really bolt spacing and size that is killing me. To make ACI the most efficient the bolts need to be sized to take just a little more than the applied load to ensure steel failure. Typically the bolt design is not adjustable by the foundation engineer where we do work. Here is what I...
Back
Top