Normally, there is one set of flange for class break, let says: different pressure, or different material....
Does anybody know what the reason is? Do we have to need this set of flange?
I am sorry I should have provided more detial information. This PSV is dicharged into a closed system, reducer is to increase discharge pipe size.
Thanks!
Is it preferred that using Flat On Top Eccentric Reducer on psv discharge? Somebody disagree with me using concentric reducer on psv discharge.
Thanks!
Do we need provide more space than usual for piping connection when hydrolic tensioning is supposed to use for large bolts?
for example, P&ID shows 10" flanged valve and 12x10 reducer, shoud I connect piping as 10" flanged valve, 200 mm pup, then 12x10 reducer?
or between flanged valve and...
thanks Mikehalloran.
I know round dimension looks nicer, my question "do we have to?"
in fab and construction, people prefer round number on iso overall dimension or single component (fitting dimension is fixed, only non-fitting dimension is variablle)?
Do we have to ensure the dimensions on ISO drawing is even? for example, from equipment nozzle to elbow should be 2300mm instead of 2297mm; control valve station from one elbow to another elbow should be 4200mm instead of 4186mm? etc...
thank you!
thanks for your reply pennpiper, I am still confused.
let's say 1" NPS pipe, we use pipe only for short distance (4" or 6"), if it is not in vent, drain connection. We don't use nipple in this cae. Do you know the reason?