Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations MintJulep on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Search results for query: *

  1. Mikeqc1

    Destructive testing of pipe

    Does not seem right huh?
  2. Mikeqc1

    Destructive testing of pipe

    i have an MTR for the 4" with a .281 wall, the impactsubsize works out over 80% but on that case what cert the tensile pull is .965 x .394 how can that be? As for the 5" pipe the wall thickness covers my concern. You input has helped me to decide that i will not reject this load of pipe, but i...
  3. Mikeqc1

    Destructive testing of pipe

    sa-333 5" xs pipe
  4. Mikeqc1

    Destructive testing of pipe

    When making pipe say wall thickness .281 is being produced and needs to have tensile pulls done. how do i get a sample size of .965 x .394?
  5. Mikeqc1

    SB-171 Table 2 thickness tolerance.

    Thats what i thought
  6. Mikeqc1

    sa-333 impacts

    the impact results will be higher because of lack of restraint in the test specimen Sir could you give more detail on this?
  7. Mikeqc1

    sa-333 impacts

    So the definition of actual in this case is measured thickness (not Nominal wall thk) and since that dimention is not reported i would not have a leg to stand on by saying the sample size is less than 80%. look at this cert at the charpy size. I will speak with the AI on this, but i like to...
  8. Mikeqc1

    SB-171 Table 2 thickness tolerance.

    I have a question about note (A) in SB-171 Table 2 thickness tolerance. Im concerned about note A When tolerances are specified all plus or all minus double the value given. My material is .187 thick C61400 from a 48” wide piece. Correct me if this is wrong .187 thick C61400 is 25% greater...
  9. Mikeqc1

    sa-333 impacts

    so i cannot reject this lot based on the no reduction in this case one could say it was not needed, based on the measured wall at lab. if the wall measured at the low end of the spec it would have been above the 80% but no one knows what the measured piece was to begin with. Do you see my...
  10. Mikeqc1

    ASME-SA-312.358 pipe ID tolerance

    if you are manufacturong to code...........gotta have it
  11. Mikeqc1

    sa-333 impacts

    iwish i could spend a fewe months in a destructive lab
  12. Mikeqc1

    sa-333 impacts

    from memory..... 5" xxs SA-333 seamless pipe Impact size is .394 x .295 the temp was -45c as i was reviewing my MTRs i noticed this. i think the temp of these impact temps should have been -48c Now from the same manufacturer i got another load of 4" pipe wall .281 with the same heat# the 4"...
  13. Mikeqc1

    sa-333 impacts

    The reason for subsize samples is the lack of material in the pipe wall to aquire a full size.If the wall thickness say .375 cannot produce the proper amount of material for full size (.394) the ASME Code allows subsizes. If the subsize is 80% or Greater than the actual wall thickness no...
  14. Mikeqc1

    sa-333 impacts

    if the the impact sample is subsize, and less than 80% of actual wall thk a reduction in temp is needed my quaestion is Would the nominal wall be used for the calc or can the wall be measured. If i use the nominal it less than 80% if i use the low end of the wall thickness its within.(is that...

Part and Inventory Search