Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations waross on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Search results for query: *

  1. MattBat

    Liability aspects for segmenting B16.9 elbows on site

    ASME B16.9-2012, paragraph 6.2.4 states: "Although the elbow intended for field-segmenting must meet the requirements of this Standard, once the field-segmented elbow is cut, it is not a B16.9 product." Now the question arises, does the manufacturer continue to be liable for the elbow? My...
  2. MattBat

    Unqualified Soure Material - Lot Size (ASME Sect. III)

    Thanks for the replies! It seems I have to take a look at the Code again. Cheers, Matthias
  3. MattBat

    Unqualified Soure Material - Lot Size (ASME Sect. III)

    Hi everybody, I think I have answered my own question, but I want your opinions to doubleckeck. Dilemma: If we buy unqualified source material and test each piece of steel (product analysis only) and the material is marked with the same steel heat number by the mill, are we allowed to then...
  4. MattBat

    Marking of heat number vs. traceability code

    Hi Kiwi, thanks for your reply. On the finished material we have our code number. On the finished material MTRs we have our code number as well as the heat number from the starting material. This allows the customer to trace the fitting back to our MTR and from our MTR to the starting material...
  5. MattBat

    Marking of heat number vs. traceability code

    Hi everybody, We just had a Aramco inspector reject a bunch of our fittings (acc. to ASTM A234) because he wants the heat number (as issued by the steel mill) instead of our traceability code number marked on the fittings. ASTM A234 requires "and the heat number or the manufacturer’s heat...

Part and Inventory Search