70btdc
Automotive
- Jul 22, 2008
- 53
I found a link to this engine idea whilst browsing another automotive website:
I am having some trouble grasping exactly what they claim is the main reason for the huge FE number. I can see some merit of designing the motor/generator set dirctly into the crankshaft in terms of packaging/weight, and that the cylinder deactivation will gain some efficiency, but how to they really get to 110mpg?
When cylinders are deactivated they seem to state that the friction forces are balanced by electromagnetic forces. But if this energy is recovered at the crank in the first place, then how can this raise total efficiency? Assuming we start and end with the same battery SOC and on a flat road aren't we just losing out to conversion efficiency through the motor/generator?
Any one come across this engine already? It is fitted into the Ford GT based 'Revenge Verde' Prototype Supercar.
I am having some trouble grasping exactly what they claim is the main reason for the huge FE number. I can see some merit of designing the motor/generator set dirctly into the crankshaft in terms of packaging/weight, and that the cylinder deactivation will gain some efficiency, but how to they really get to 110mpg?
When cylinders are deactivated they seem to state that the friction forces are balanced by electromagnetic forces. But if this energy is recovered at the crank in the first place, then how can this raise total efficiency? Assuming we start and end with the same battery SOC and on a flat road aren't we just losing out to conversion efficiency through the motor/generator?
Any one come across this engine already? It is fitted into the Ford GT based 'Revenge Verde' Prototype Supercar.