-
1
- #1
levithon
Electrical
- Oct 5, 2002
- 1
Hi,
I'm new to this board and have a question concerning GFCI-protection of motors. I'm not familiar with the NEC or its decision making procedures, but had the following questions:
1) Is it true that in the latest NEC codebook (2002), that the requirement for GFCI-protection of swimming pool motors for commercial/semi-commercial applications has been reversed?
2) If so, do you know what the reason for this was?
This is what I have been told:
a) There is no requirement for putting swimming pool pumps/motors on GFCI for residential homes, that this rule (680-6(d))applies only for commercial applications.
b) That the original impetus for having 680-6(d) was a concern by the Board of Health when a commercial pool pump accidentally tripped and raised health issues about unfiltered water.
c) That as of the 2002 NEC codebook, that even the commercial rule has been backed out so that now NO motor is required to be GFCI-protected.
d) That most electricians were against GFCI-protection of swimming pool motors in the first place.
e) That the reason they are against it is because the accidental tripping potential is a huge annoyance.
f) That the liklihood of a hazzardous/life-threatening situation due to not having a swimming pool pump GFCI-protected is extremely improbable.
Levithon
I'm new to this board and have a question concerning GFCI-protection of motors. I'm not familiar with the NEC or its decision making procedures, but had the following questions:
1) Is it true that in the latest NEC codebook (2002), that the requirement for GFCI-protection of swimming pool motors for commercial/semi-commercial applications has been reversed?
2) If so, do you know what the reason for this was?
This is what I have been told:
a) There is no requirement for putting swimming pool pumps/motors on GFCI for residential homes, that this rule (680-6(d))applies only for commercial applications.
b) That the original impetus for having 680-6(d) was a concern by the Board of Health when a commercial pool pump accidentally tripped and raised health issues about unfiltered water.
c) That as of the 2002 NEC codebook, that even the commercial rule has been backed out so that now NO motor is required to be GFCI-protected.
d) That most electricians were against GFCI-protection of swimming pool motors in the first place.
e) That the reason they are against it is because the accidental tripping potential is a huge annoyance.
f) That the liklihood of a hazzardous/life-threatening situation due to not having a swimming pool pump GFCI-protected is extremely improbable.
Levithon