Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations KootK on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

A-105 Flanges Normalized and Produced to Fine Grain Practice

Status
Not open for further replies.

wsmith22

Mechanical
Nov 9, 2005
61
Are these flanges readily available or would it be better to use SA-350 LF2 material? Our flange distributors cannot locate flanges that meet the fine grain practice requirement per SA-20.

Thank you.
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

SA-20 is for plates.
See Referenced Documents in SA-105. Read SA-105 in full.

Regards
 
Yes, it is confusing because Figure UCS-66 General Note (d)(2): fine grain practice is defined as the procedure necessary to obtain a fine austenitic grain size as described in SA-20.
 
Yes they can be made and purchased with a fine grain melting practice and a normalizing heat treatment; however, this does not insure meeting -50F impacts.
 
SA-20 is for plates.

"If you don't have time to do the job right the first time, when are you going to find time to repair it?"
 
And the fine grain melting practice does not have to meet SA-20 guidelines. Withot knowing, you may get soemething you really don't want. If you need high impat toughness below -20F, buy the appropriate SA-320 grade forgingss. There are other parameters besides normalizing and fine grain melting that must be taken into account by the forging manufacturer to achieve low temp toughness.
 
As per B16.5 SA-105 flange can be withstand up to maximum -29 deg C. Hence as per your desired -46 deg C MDMT it shall not be work.

Further to regarding the normalized / fine grain practice, this has been revised in ASME SEC VIII Div. 1 2019 ver., now the SA-105N is coming under the curve B earlier it was in curve A.

However, I would recommend you to go for the SA-350 LF2 CL. 1 material straight away without worrying and also to avoid the any inconvenience in the future by ASME Auditor.
 
Where does the low temperature requirement come in? The OP has mentioned nothing about temperature.

With respect to A105 being allowed to go automatically to -29 deg C, people might want to think again about that. Take a look at:
Steve Jones
Corrosion Management Consultant


All answers are personal opinions only and are in no way connected with any employer.
 
From my understanding of ASME BPVC Section VIII Div 1 2019, UCS-66,

ASTM A105 is permitted to -8C, ASTM A105N is permitted to -29C, and ASTM A350 LF2 Class 1 is permitted to -45C.

The revision in 2019 was brought about by failures in A105 flanges at temperatures warmer than previously permitted -29C and I also understand there remains some concern still, hinting at further reforms to the use of A105 at low temps. I generally opt for A350 LF2 Class 1 for all flanges below 0C now, based on performance, availability and anticipation of further reforms.
 
wsmith22,

Let's try another way. If it's for a piping system , what's the piping class? The piping class should give you the temperature limits. If not, give us some design/operating conditions to guide you if SA350 LF2 flanges are a good fit for A105N. In general, grain refinement gives higher impact strength resistance and allows to use for lower temperature. SA 350 LF2 are used in low-temp service conditions.

GDD
Canada
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor