Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations waross on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

AASHTO Bridge Seismic Isolation Design

Status
Not open for further replies.

Uzil

Structural
Sep 19, 2016
6
Hi again guys,

I recently been tasked to identify the required stiffnesses of the bearing that will be used on our bridge project. From my previous thread, I learned worked examples on different conditions of bridges under the FHWA guidelines. Now, I am again seeking guidance on how to design our bridge using AASHTO's guidelines for seismic isolation design (2010). I was able to get the design examples done by NSCHRP (NSCHRP 20-7/Task 262(M2)), however, the conditions were different from our bridge.

Our bridge is under Type III Soil under the Japan Road Association(JRA) classification which is equivalent to Site Class E or F of AASHTO LRFD 2012. From the seismic isolation code, they mentioned 4 analysis procedures for seismically isolated bridges, namely: Simplified method, Single Mode Spectral method, Multimodal Spectral method, and Time-History method. Given our soil condition, its evident that non-linear time-history analysis is the most appropriate procedure to do, however, from our country, such records are not available. That is why I tried to study the simplified method and multimodal spectral method to make my analysis from nonlinear to linear.

Now, as I progress with these methods, I found out that for Soil Type F the simplified method is not allowed. Hence, I am reaching out to you guys for your expertise regarding this matter. Your help will be much appreciated.

Thanks!!!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor