WBell
Structural
- Mar 21, 2018
- 19
I have set up a Mathcad Prime worksheet (PDF copy attached) which solves for the required depth of embedment, D, for the lateral earth pressure shown in Figure 3.11.5.6-5, AASHTO 2010 LRFD Bridge Design Specifications. The retained soil and embedment soil are both cohesive. The worksheet solves for D = -6.15 feet for an excavation depth of 18 feet using the flange of an HP 14x117 member to engage the passive pressure resistance (b = 14 inches). The piles are spaced at 6 feet on center.
I am going to develop a model for the same conditions in PYWALL (Ensoft) to see what the response of the wall is. The AASHTO model only provides the required depth of embedment to maintain equilibrium and it is up to the user to evaluate strength criterion such as flexural/shear loads on the member and serviceability criteria (e.g., deflection).
I have also submitted the worksheet to the Mathcad developer to check on how to plot the equation for equilibrium of forces about the tip to see if there are other reasonable (i.e., greater embedment depth) solutions.
If anyone else has used the AASHTO equations for nongravity retaining walls as a check on software (PYWALL/LPILE), I would appreciate your comments and observations.
I am going to develop a model for the same conditions in PYWALL (Ensoft) to see what the response of the wall is. The AASHTO model only provides the required depth of embedment to maintain equilibrium and it is up to the user to evaluate strength criterion such as flexural/shear loads on the member and serviceability criteria (e.g., deflection).
I have also submitted the worksheet to the Mathcad developer to check on how to plot the equation for equilibrium of forces about the tip to see if there are other reasonable (i.e., greater embedment depth) solutions.
If anyone else has used the AASHTO equations for nongravity retaining walls as a check on software (PYWALL/LPILE), I would appreciate your comments and observations.