ulyssess
Materials
- Aug 23, 2007
- 86
Hello
Some ASME standards permit an accelerated cooling after normalizing when permitted by the purchaser.
e.g. SA387-5.1: accelerated cooling from austenitizing temperature by air blasting or liquid quenching, followed by tempering
e.g. SA516-5.4: cooling rates faster than those obtained by cooling in air are permissible for improvement of the toughness....
I assume that plates produced with accelerated cooling are to be tested according SA20 per mother-plate at one end, even if the cooling was carried out in water. Some people believe, that cooling in water would be in reality a quenching and therefore, the testing should be carried out per heat treated unit with tensile testing on both sides as reuqired in SA20.
I found in ASME VIII,1 Article UHT1 an indication, that accelerated cooled plates are not considered as Q+T plates and UHT is not applicable. Why should it be different in ASME II?
I know the interpretation II-A-04-01, but I guess this is not applicable as Q+T is not an optional delivery condition in SA387 or SA516.
Has anyone other interpretations or articles of ASME on this subject (supporting or contradicting my opinion)
Thanks in advance
Some ASME standards permit an accelerated cooling after normalizing when permitted by the purchaser.
e.g. SA387-5.1: accelerated cooling from austenitizing temperature by air blasting or liquid quenching, followed by tempering
e.g. SA516-5.4: cooling rates faster than those obtained by cooling in air are permissible for improvement of the toughness....
I assume that plates produced with accelerated cooling are to be tested according SA20 per mother-plate at one end, even if the cooling was carried out in water. Some people believe, that cooling in water would be in reality a quenching and therefore, the testing should be carried out per heat treated unit with tensile testing on both sides as reuqired in SA20.
I found in ASME VIII,1 Article UHT1 an indication, that accelerated cooled plates are not considered as Q+T plates and UHT is not applicable. Why should it be different in ASME II?
I know the interpretation II-A-04-01, but I guess this is not applicable as Q+T is not an optional delivery condition in SA387 or SA516.
Has anyone other interpretations or articles of ASME on this subject (supporting or contradicting my opinion)
Thanks in advance