Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations GregLocock on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Accumulator volume problem

Status
Not open for further replies.

ITBT

Mechanical
Oct 6, 2002
27
I came across an accumulator volume problem that needs help.

I charged the an EPE AS55 accumulator from 0 to 4500 psi and turned off inlet valve. The pressure droped a little and stablized at 4000 psi. Then I opened outlet valve to collect water till pressure droped to 1600 psi.

In this case P1=1600 psi, P2=4500 psi, so accumulator precharge pressure P0=1300 psi. According to the chart, I expected the volume to be 24.5 litre, but only managed to get 17.5 litre.

Can anybody recomment on the shortage of volume. Thanks in advance.
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

The chart you are using assumed the changes to the accumulator are isothermal. That is, the P and V changes are occurring slowly and heat is being removed or added to maintain a constant T. However your results are adiabatic. That is, your changes are occurring faster than ambient heat can maintain the accumulator gas T constant.

For example, the AS55 has a 50 liter gas volume bladder and you have define P0 = 1300, P1=1600 and P2=4000.

Calculating the isothermal volume changes would be as per the equations
P0XV0=P2XV2 gives V3=(P0/P2)XV0 or (1300/4000)X50, which gives V2=16.3
Simairly P2XV2=P1XV1 gives V1=40.6. The expected fluid would be V1-V2 = 24.3
This volume agrees with your chart.


Assuming the accumulator is charges with N2 (ideal gas k=1.4). Allowing the pressure to stabilize after filling will be isothermal, thus V2 would be the same. The adiabatic expansion from P2 to P1 would be as per the equations
P2XV2^1.4=P1XV1^1.4, gives V1=V2X(P2/P1)^(1/1.4) or 16.3X(4000/1600)^0.71, which gives V1= 31.4. The expected fluid would be V1-V2=15.1 While calculated volume is less than your results, since some heat would have been absorbed by the accumulator, it agrees with what you observed.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor