Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations KootK on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

AI based visual inspection in aerospace manufacturing

dutchguy

New member
Nov 18, 2004
14
Dear fellow engineers,

I am looking for information about the use of AI based visual inspection for aerospace manufacturing.

Can anyone point me in the right direction to find information about this or find someone who can ?

Much appreciated and thanks in advance.
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

I'll rephrase your question so that it means more to me ... "I'm looking for information about how AI is used in the development of visual inspections for airplane maintenance (ICAs = Instructions for Continued Airworthiness)."

In my experience, it isn't.

If you meant something different, please restate.
 
Although mine last name is Paulus, this time I meant something different:

Is there someone who can help me find a way to use AI in analyzing data gathered during visual inspection of manufactured aerospace parts by using camera's ie. ? Furthermore, the requirements refer to scratches, dents, irregularities in paint quality, etc. Also, it would be convenient if AI would give me information where those defects are located on the parts by making a plot and the bring defect area would then be colored.

I hope this helps in understanding.
 
OP
I am sure there is a company out there can write a program to accept such criteria. It is not free.
This will be very specialized
 
OK, so you want "AI" to interpret the basic inspection findings (is this scratch significant or not ?) or possibly to present the findings of an inspection (look ! there's a scratch here !!) ? Neither seem to be applicable to AI ... the OEM defines damage limits on different structures, and how to repair them.

Or do you want to automate the inspection ??
 
As AI cannot make decisions on its own, it will have to advise the inspector in finding the errors on the parts/components enabling him to make a decision if the part/component has a non conformity or not and where it is located.

So yes, I want to make the inspection partly automated, but also to help the inspectors. I think that AI could decrease inspection time.
 
Last edited:
I don't think AI will "decrease inspection time" per se; one thing that AI undeniably shines at is perserverance, i.e., it won't get tired, it won't get bored, and it won't miss anything at hour 24 that it wouldn't have missed at hour 1.

A well-trained AI will likely more consistent catch things that a human observer would have missed, so if anything, the inspection and rework process will slow down, because more defects will be caught and more defects will require adjudication by a human and more defects will require rework or rejection.

You may find that management will likely ditch the AI inspection idea after a while, because they won't want to make the costly changes needed to minimize the number of defects found by the AI.
 
SAE is leading this charge... lots of related info. See SAE website.
 
"can AI do a better job than a human in this case?"
<question mark inserted in place of the period to give some sign that a question is being asked>

The answer is "yes" and "no".
Yes of course any form of automation can accomplish well-specified tasks for which the algorithm can be programmed to respond.
No of course a human can recognize and investigate in ways that are very difficult to define or pre-program in advance.

At some point aircraft inspection will take the leap that medicine has done with the analysis of chest x-rays and other diagnostics. An algorithm can be used to speed up and make more accurate the interpretation and diagnosis, but a human still needs to be in the loop to double-check it and validate the result. And while some people convince themselves that the human delivering the computer's result can get dumber and dumber as the technology advances, I believe that the human that accepts and takes action on the diagnosis should always be a professional with the ability to understand and interpret the result themselves. It will probably be the same with aviation if these types of inspections are adopted.

In aircraft, like medicine, the part that computers cannot (and never IMO) do is take responsibility for the inspection. There needs to be a responsible party at the point of validation of any test result, good or bad. Only humans can do that.
 
I still think that AI can help us making better (read better quality) products and at the end lower the manufacturing cost, by decreasing non-conforming products.

AI is a tool in improvement of the inspector's task. AI pointing at the defective areas and the inspector making the decisions whether the part is defective or not.

In the beginning it will cost some more in order to improve manufacturing processes and perform extra rework, but it will pay back at the end. The costumer will be happy, less NC's (here at Fokker an NC cost roughly 3000 euro) and higher quality products.

Moreover, if inspection requirements will be lowered by engineering (which in my opinion is not necessary) that's up to them. But why should we go in that direction, when the goal would be higher quality products?
 
In addition to the above, who can help us finding a company, which works with AI based visual inspection?
 
Machine vision systems have been inspecting a lot of things for a long time.

Machine vision makes pass or fail judgement based on quantifiable measurements.

Are you perhaps conflating AI and machine vision?
 

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor