Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations waross on being selected by the Tek-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Allen variance (oscillator stability) measurement/estimation errors 1

Status
Not open for further replies.

franck

Aerospace
May 29, 2001
48
0
0
ES
Dear all,

Once again I would need some of your lights on the following problem. Really, I have to assess the stability of an oscillator. To do this, I have used a very stable oscillator (MASER) and I have compared its frequency to my oscillator through a frequency counter (sampling performed every seconds). The test was run for several days. Then I have plotted/calculated the Allen variance. The plot looks good but I would like to know the following:

a)Is there a good reference (book, article or else) addressing the measurement errors and their impact on the Allen variance calculation like the following (I have seen some documentations on the net but it is never really addressing these points):
a1)Usually the Allen variance assumes that each measurement is an averaging. Thus, having my frequency sampling set to 1 second, is it valid to calculate the Allen variance for 1 second (or instead the Allen variance starts to be meaningful at 10 sec or 100 sec….)?
a2)The Allen variance must follow some statistics (which one?) and as such what is the error calculation associated to each measurement?
a3)How many points do I need to derive a meaningful Allen variance: for instance if my measurement is one day long (86400 seconds) what is the maximum averaging I can calculate (could it be 10000 seconds corresponds to approximately 9 points or less?)?
a4)It is said that the reference oscillator must be 2 order of magnitude better than the required stability assessment but if the reference oscillator is not that great (only one order of magnitude better) is there some calculation to assess the error associated on the measurement?

That’s all....

Franck
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

While you're waiting for a subject matter expert, I googled NIST Frequency Measurement and found the following book chapter (perhaps a copyright violation?):


NIST is the USA agency that works in this field, so NIST is a useful keyword when searching.

The two orders of magnitude sounds overly tight. Most calibration systems are happy with 6:1 minimum, preferably at least one order of magnitude (10:1). The chapter linked above seems to confirm this.
 
Two orders of magnitude gives +/-1% accuracy to your measurement.
One order of magnitude gives +/-10% accuracy to your measurement.

Could just be a rule of thumb...

Z
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top