Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations waross on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

alternative injection molding material to ECTFE

Status
Not open for further replies.

gao7857

Mechanical
Aug 16, 2010
37
US
Hi there,

I am looking for an alternative injection molding material for ECTFE. Basically need to have "low smoke " feature and comparable mechanical properties.

Thanks,
Gao
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

You can compare mechanicals of all plastics for free at
If you're using ECTFE you're not just using it for mechanicals as other plastics would get you there far more cheaply. Probably you need great chemical resistance or some other property too.

Chris DeArmitt PhD FRSC CChem
 
I never recommend any material on such limited data. It takes some understanding of the application or at least what properties are most required and why.

Hence my reluctance to comment earlier.

Regards
Pat
See FAQ731-376 for tips on use of eng-tips by professional engineers &
for site rules
 
Sorry for the unclear descriptions.
The product is for air handling applications, it need to have UL V-level fammability, good service temperature (RTI>=125, that of ECTFE). It need similar mechanical strength and chemial resistance, and good to process. Do not want fluoropolymers.
I found PEI, PEEK as candidates, but they need higher mold temperature that seems can only achieved by oil. Also product-life is an issue, I noticed that ECTFE can claim >5 years but PEEK 1~2 years.
 
You need to do a lot more homework

It needs UL V what. There are 3 different levels.

Good is an extremely vague term for service temperature. Also service temperature can be heat deflection, continuous use or a ULrating for electrical insulation. RTI is not a service temperature, it's Relative Tracking Index, which seems a weird requirement for an air duct.

Good chemical resistance also seems strange for an air duct. Do you have any particular types of chemical in mind or are you talking all chemicals.

Regards
Pat
See FAQ731-376 for tips on use of eng-tips by professional engineers &
for site rules
 
Hi Pat,

V0/1/2 all acceptable since they dont support burning, so can claim self-distinguish. V0 is the best.
What would be appropriate requirements for air duct? Sorry I am not familiar with HVAC. We also have smoke tests that seems all materials can pass. Because mechanical strength is the main concern, RTI-str and RTI-imp are main indicators.
As for chemical resistance, it will be general industrial chemicals like mild acid and base; do not expect encounter with organic solvents.
This part is not structural component nor withstand large load. I guess that's why it does not have strict requirements.

Thanks,
Yan
 
Hi Pat,

Thanks for the recommendations. FR PP and FR PET are definitely good directions based on RTI, strength and molding. I did not look at these two before and I appreciated it.
What I learnt from our marketing is that the customer got used to these Halar material and it will raise their concern if some parameters are lower than before. ECTFE has some radiation resistance; although it is not a necessity for air duct, it becomes a marketing point and something we want to keep. (this one has a bit history) That's why I start to look for PEEK and PEI type of things (also PS, PPSU, etc), something that can looks equivalent or better than ECTFE.

Thanks,
Yan
 
Just remember the FR additive can reduce other properties as can colours. Some colours really ruin RTI.

Regards
Pat
See FAQ731-376 for tips on use of eng-tips by professional engineers &
for site rules
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top