Ibeam
Structural
- Sep 12, 2001
- 42
I'm having some trouble using ACI 318 Appendix-D for determining embedment length for pull-out.
Situation:
I have an octagonal shaped pedestal/cap, 16'x16', supported by drilled piers. The foundation supports a round vessel, 13'-6" diameter. The moment at the base of the vessel creates tension in some of the bolts. Mserv. = 4700 k-ft. due mostly to WL. DL+Oper.= 231 kip.
Issue 1: The a-bolts are on a bolt-circle pattern, 14'-4" diameter. The least edge distance to center of bolt is 10-inches. What is the best way in determining the Projected concrete failure area(An)for the group?
Issue 2: Per the vessel designers, the a-bolts are 24-each, 2.5-inch dia., F1554 Gr.105. This is a very strong bolt. If I adhere to the ACI code, then I would imagine that the required embedment is greater than 25-inches. In section RD.5.2.2, is this to be interperated that if more than 25" embed, then appendix D doesn't apply?
Issue 3: If the bolt is oversized, which I think it is, is there a minimum pullout capacity to tension force ratio that if you meet; then there's a reduction in the required embedment?
Thanks.
Situation:
I have an octagonal shaped pedestal/cap, 16'x16', supported by drilled piers. The foundation supports a round vessel, 13'-6" diameter. The moment at the base of the vessel creates tension in some of the bolts. Mserv. = 4700 k-ft. due mostly to WL. DL+Oper.= 231 kip.
Issue 1: The a-bolts are on a bolt-circle pattern, 14'-4" diameter. The least edge distance to center of bolt is 10-inches. What is the best way in determining the Projected concrete failure area(An)for the group?
Issue 2: Per the vessel designers, the a-bolts are 24-each, 2.5-inch dia., F1554 Gr.105. This is a very strong bolt. If I adhere to the ACI code, then I would imagine that the required embedment is greater than 25-inches. In section RD.5.2.2, is this to be interperated that if more than 25" embed, then appendix D doesn't apply?
Issue 3: If the bolt is oversized, which I think it is, is there a minimum pullout capacity to tension force ratio that if you meet; then there's a reduction in the required embedment?
Thanks.