Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!

Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!

  • Congratulations cowski on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Anodizing vs. CCC 1

Status
Not open for further replies.

metallurgisttaj

Materials
Joined
Jun 24, 2008
Messages
5
Location
CA
I have a document that says for general surfaces of aluminum, the part shall be chromate conversion coated per MIL-C-5541, Class 1A or anodized per MIL-A-8625 Type 1, Class 1.
I like to know, how does one select one process over the other (anodizing vs. CCC)? Any feedback will be helpful.
Thank you.
 
cost
cosmetic reasons
corrosion protection
to name a few
 
MIL-A-8625 Type 1, Class 1 is superior for corrosion resistance. MIL-C-5541 degrade when exposed for long time to temperatures above 60 C degrees.
 
metallurgisttaj,

Chemical conversion coatings are electrically conductive, and very much more fragile than an anodized finish. (Hexavalent) chromium conversion coatings are not RoHS compliant.

You can specify RoHS compliant chemical conversion coatings.

Critter.gif
JHG
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top